Finite linear combination of continuous functions is continuous?

In summary, a finite linear combination of continuous functions is continuous. This means that if you take a finite number of continuous functions and combine them using addition and scalar multiplication, the resulting function will also be continuous. This property is fundamental in analysis and is used in various mathematical applications.
  • #1
docnet
Gold Member
799
486
TL;DR Summary
This isn't a homework problem but a general question that I had.
Is the linear combination of Lipschitz continuous functions also continuous?
##G## and ##H## are real valued Lipschitz continuous functions. There exists a ##K_1,K_2\geq 0## such that for all ##s,t##,
$$(s-t)^2\leq K_1^2 (G(s)-G(t))^2$$
and
$$(s-t)^2\leq K_2^2 (H(s)-H(t))^2.$$
Is ##aG(t)+bH(t)## where ##a,b## are real constants also Lipschitz continuous?
I tried showing this is true and am having difficulty.
$$\begin{align*}
(s-t)^2&\leq K_3^2 (aG(t)+bH(t) -(aG(s)+bH(s)))^2\\
&= K_3^2(aG(t)-aG(s))+(bH(t)-bH(s)))^2\\
&= K_3^2 (a(G(t)-G(s))+b(H(t)-H(s)))^2\\
&=K_3^2(a^2(G(t)-G(s))^2+b^2(H(t)-H(s))^2 +ab(G(t)-G(s))(H(t)-H(s))
\end{align*}$$
I considered choosing ##K=\max\left(\frac{K_1}{a},\frac{K_2}{b} \right)## but realized it wouldn't work. A Little help would go a long way. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Oh yikes... it turns out the definition of Lipschitz continuous is wrong in my notes. I also think that the easiest way to find ##K_3## is using the triangle inequality after doing some work using the correct definition.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #3
docnet said:
Oh yikes... it turns out the definition of Lipschitz continuous is wrong in my notes. I also think that the easiest way to find ##K_3## is using the triangle inequality after doing some work using the correct definition.
Yes. Good catch. The definition you have in post #1 allows the function, G, to grow with unlimited speed. The correct definition of "Lipschitz continuous" is intended to do the opposite and limit the speed.
 
  • Like
Likes docnet
  • #4
FactChecker said:
Yes. Good catch. The definition you have in post #1 allows the function, G, to grow with unlimited speed. The correct definition of "Lipschitz continuous" is intended to do the opposite and limit the speed.
Noted! Thank you.

The wrong definition is also false, because for ##s##, ##t## and ##G## such that ##|s-t|>0## and ##G(s)=G(t)##, there does not exist a ##K\geq 0## such that ## |s-t|\leq K| G(s)-G(t)| = 0##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top