Finite Metric Space Imbedding in Manifolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dragonfall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Metric
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether every finite metric space can be embedded in a manifold, specifically questioning the feasibility of embedding spaces with four points. Participants suggest starting with smaller finite metric spaces, such as those with 0 to 3 points, before tackling four points. One participant presents a specific example of a metric space that appears challenging to embed in a connected Riemannian manifold, though they admit a lack of conclusive proof. The complexity of embedding finite metric spaces in manifolds raises significant questions about the nature of such embeddings. The conversation highlights the intricate relationship between finite metric spaces and manifold structures.
Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
Is every finite metric space imbeddable in a manifold?

That is, for every finite metric space (X,d), does there exist some manifold such that there are |X| many points on it which is isometric (with the length of geodesics as metric) to (X,d)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you do a set with 4 points?
 
What do you mean?
 
"Every finite metric space" is a tall order. Try starting with embedding "every metric space with 4 points" into Riemannian manifolds. (Actually, why not start with 0, 1, 2, 3, and then 4?)

(P.S. I assume you mean "connected and Riemannian" manifolds?)
 
OK, it seems this one

o
\
o ---- o
/
o

where the metric is the number of steps between nodes, can't be done. But I can't prove it conclusively.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top