A First Order in Time Derivatives + Phase Space

thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Hey all,
I am reading David Tong's notes on Chern-Simons: https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qhe/five.pdf
and he makes the following statement that doesn't make much sense to me: "Because the Chern-Simons theory is first order in time derivatives, these Wilson loops are really parameterising the phase space of solutions, rather than the configuration space."
What exactly does he mean by "solutions"? Also what is the relation between being first order in time derivative and these different spaces.
 
  • Like
Likes gentzen and jbergman
Physics news on Phys.org
thatboi said:
"Because the Chern-Simons theory is first order in time derivatives, these Wilson loops are really parameterising the phase space of solutions, rather than the configuration space."
What exactly does he mean by "solutions"? Also what is the relation between being first order in time derivative and these different spaces.
The phase space of a dynamical system defined by a stationary action principle is isomorphic to the space of initial conditions of the resulting system of differential equations. A differential equation for ##q(t)## that is first order in time needs the initial value for ##q## only, hence has the configuration space as phase space. But if the differential equation is of second order in time, one needs initial conditions on ##q## and its first time derivative, which after the conventional Legendre transform leads to a first order system in a Hamiltonian phase space that is ''twice as large'', whose points are labelled by ##(q,p)##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes thatboi, vanhees71 and gentzen
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top