Fissionable Elements: Breeding, Unstable Isotopes, Critical Mass

  • Thread starter GiTS
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Elements
In summary, heavier elements cannot be practically made from lighter ones through breeding. Unstable isotopes of light elements do not give off enough energy when bombarded with neutrons to produce a considerable amount of energy. The critical mass of an isotope is determined by its atomic density and microscopic fission cross-section, which is dependent on neutron energy. It is not practical to use neutron capture to change elements lighter than Uranium into heavier elements due to their rarity and the difficulty of the process. Thorium has potential as an alternative fuel source, but other elements lighter than it have short half-lives and are not suitable for neutron capture. Overall, the process of neutron capture for breeding heavier elements is not practical due to various factors, including cost and
  • #1
GiTS
135
0
I have a few questions: can heavier elements be made from lighter ones through breeding? Do unstable isotopes of light elements (lighter than lead) give off enough enough energy , when bombarded with nuetrons, to pruduce a coniderable amount of energy? What determines an isotopes critical mass?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
GiTS said:
I have a few questions: can heavier elements be made from lighter ones through breeding?
When an isotope absorbs a neutron, it becomes heavier by 1 amu. The nucleus most often decays by beta emission, so the Z increases by 1, and the nucleus becomes a new element. Successive n-capture results in heavier isotopes and new elements.

It is not practical to use neutron capture to change elements lighter than U into heavier elements.

GiTS said:
Do unstable isotopes of light elements (lighter than lead) give off enough enough energy, when bombarded with nuetrons, to pruduce a coniderable amount of energy?
No.

GiTS said:
What determines an isotopes critical mass?
The atomic density and microscopic fission cross-section, the latter being dependent on the neutron energy.
 
  • #3
Astronuc said:
It is not practical to use neutron capture to change elements lighter than U into heavier elements.


By not practical, do you mean that only a little amount can be transmuted or that all other elements can be acquired in an easier fashion?
 
  • #4
It is not practical to use neutron capture to change elements lighter than U into heavier elements.
Actually, I made a somewhat incorrect or misleading statement here. Th-232 may absorb a neutron to become Th-233, which after two successive beta decays becomes U-233. This reaction is the basis of thermal breeder reactor, in contrast to fast breeder reactor (FBR). It would not be practical to try to make Pu-239 or Am-242 from Th however.

Thorium is quite abundant, and in fact, thorium has significant potential as an alternative to U. http://www.nacworldwide.com/Links/Thorium-Fuel.htm
http://www.thoriumpower.com/files/tech publications/Engineering International 1999 article.pdf

Looking at other elements lighter than Th - http://wwwndc.tokai.jaeri.go.jp/CN04/CN024.html and http://wwwndc.tokai.jaeri.go.jp/CN04/CN023.html ,
one has Ac, Ra, Fr, Rn, At, Po, Bi, of which Bi-209 is the only non-radioactive nuclide - all other nuclides are radioactive in varying degrees of specific activity. Rn is a gas, and Fr has relatively low melting point, in common with the other alkali elements.

Nuclides like Th-232, U-235, U-238 have half-lives in excess of 700 million years, and U-233 has a half-life of 159000 years, so it has a little more activity than others, but this is longer than the half-lives of Pu-239 (24100 yrs), Pu-240 (6564 yrs) and Pu-241 (14.35 yrs). In commercial fuel reprocessing, one of the issues is the buildup of Pu-240 and more so Pu-241, because their radioactivity requires remote handling.

By not practical, I mean the target elements are rare or expensive (which is related to being rare), and there are less expensive alternatives, e.g. Th. Also, as theCandyman mentioned so little would be converted or rather the conversion rate would be low (there is the matter of n-capture cross-section). The further one goes down in mass, the less practical n-capture becomes (the number of successive n-captures goes up). Then one has to deal with the difficulty of the radiological issue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: Fissionable Elements: Breeding, Unstable Isotopes, Critical Mass

What is fissionable material and why is it important?

Fissionable material is any element that is capable of undergoing nuclear fission, the process of splitting an atom's nucleus into smaller fragments. This process releases a large amount of energy, which can be harnessed for various purposes, such as generating electricity. Fissionable material is important because it is the main source of energy for nuclear power plants and weapons.

How do unstable isotopes play a role in nuclear fission?

Unstable isotopes, also known as radioactive isotopes, are the key to nuclear fission. These isotopes have nuclei that are not stable and can break apart easily, releasing energy in the process. This energy is what drives the fission reaction and can be controlled to produce heat for electricity or uncontrolled to create a nuclear explosion.

What is critical mass and why is it important in nuclear reactions?

Critical mass is the minimum amount of fissionable material required to sustain a nuclear chain reaction. If the amount of fissionable material is below the critical mass, the reaction will not continue. However, if it is above the critical mass, the reaction will become self-sustaining. It is important to control the amount of fissionable material to prevent an uncontrolled and potentially dangerous chain reaction.

Can fissionable elements be bred or created?

Yes, some fissionable elements, such as uranium-233 and plutonium-239, can be bred or created through a process called nuclear transmutation. This involves bombarding non-fissionable elements with neutrons to induce a nuclear reaction and create fissionable isotopes. However, this process is complex and expensive, and only a small amount of fissionable material can be bred at a time.

What are the potential risks and benefits of using fissionable material for energy?

The main benefit of using fissionable material for energy is its high energy density, which means it can produce a large amount of energy using a small amount of material. However, there are also potential risks, such as nuclear accidents and the production of radioactive waste, which can have long-term effects on the environment and human health. It is important to carefully manage and regulate the use of fissionable material to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks.

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top