Flipping Limits in Integrals: Is it Valid?

  • Thread starter Kat007
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Limits
In summary, the conversation discusses whether it is correct to say that an integral with a lower limit of x and an upper limit of positive infinity is equal to an integral with a lower limit of negative infinity and an upper limit of minus x. The speaker also asks for a link to a website showing such a rule. The response is that in general, there is no such rule, but it may hold true if the integrand is an even function. The conversation then clarifies that this is the case for the speaker's specific example of a standard normal cumulative distribution function.
  • #1
Kat007
29
0
Hello,

Could you please tell me is it correct to say this:
If I have integral with lower limit of (x) and upper limit of (positive infinity), does it equal to
integral of lower limit (minus infinity) and upper limit (minus x)?

Do you know of any link to a website showing such a rule?

Thank you,
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Kat007 said:
Hello,

Could you please tell me is it correct to say this:
If I have integral with lower limit of (x) and upper limit of (positive infinity), does it equal to
integral of lower limit (minus infinity) and upper limit (minus x)?

Do you know of any link to a website showing such a rule?

Thank you,
In general, there's no such rule. However, if the integrand is an even function (i.e., f(-x) = f(x) for all real x), what you're asking about is true.
 
  • #3
Hi Mike,

Thank you, yes, this is the case. The integrand is the cdf of a standard normal with limits of a +ve constant on the bottom and positive infinity of the top. Then the limits flip and the signs also.

Thank you again!
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
359
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
Back
Top