Fluid Dynamics of two water reservoirs

In summary: Since the pressures where line 3 crosses the U-tube must be equal, equate them and solve for h.3.4m hg.
  • #1
Coushander
27
0

Homework Statement



The two water reservoirs shown in the figure are open to the atmosphere, and the water has density 1000 kg/m3. The manometer contains incompressible mercury with a density of 13,600 kg/m3. What is the difference in elevation h if the manometer reading m is 25.0 cm?

p12.13.jpg


Homework Equations



Bernoulli's Equation

Atmospheric pressure + 1/2(density of fluid)(speed^2) + (density)(gravity)(change in height) = constant

Continuity Equation

(density)(speed)(area) = constant [all fluids]

(speed)(area) = constant [incompressible fluids]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
"I have no idea."

You must show some ideas else we cannot assist you. We are not permitted to solve it for you - forum rules.

Hint: Think about how pressure relates to depth of fluids.
 
  • #3
I'm going to guess I have to start with the mercury. It's not open to the atmosphere so I should be able to ignore atmospheric pressure at that point.

Going by depth the pressure on the left side of the mercury "u" should be (density)(gravity)(depth)= 33354 Pa?

I could be going off here, I'm not really familiar with manometres.

Edt:

Googled a manometre, turns out that's the pressure difference that I've calculated.

Would I be able to solve for h if I divide out gravity and the density of water?

Doing so yields 3.4m as h, and the answer is actually 3.15m. So that's out. I think I need to go back and factor in atmospheric pressure.

Subtracting atmospheric pressure from Δp gives me 3.38m, closer, but not the answer and I doubt that's what I should be doing anyway.

Δp=p2-p1 I assume, and p1 must just be atmospheric pressure since it's at the top of the water. p2 should just be atmospheric pressure + ρgh, but that just rings back to 3.4m. So no, I'm missing something.

Well they're both on the top of the water, so that line of thinking is flawed. I'd make a guess to say the pressure difference might refer to the difference between the top of the water and the depth h in one side, but I've already tried that and it didn't work out.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
You need to write an equation for the pressures at two points. Draw three horizontal lines.

Line 1 is at the top of the lower reservoir's surface. It should extend to the left leg of the manometer. Line 2 is at the water mercury interface in the right leg of the manometer and it should also extend to the left leg of manometer. Line 3 is at the mercury water interface on the left leg and it should extend to the right leg. Label the distance from line 2 to line 1 as d. In your picture h should now be the distance from line 1 to the top of the upper reservoir. The distance between lines 2 and 3 should be 25 cm.

With line 3 the pressure must be equal where it crosses both legs of the manometer. If the pressures are not equal, the fluid would be moving (Bernoulli's Eqn.)

Now write equations for the pressures where line 3 crosses the manometer. Equate them. Solve.
 
  • #5
So I'm pretty sure that you're saying that pressure at the top of the left side and the top of the right side of the mercury are equal.

But I'm not sure how that would help me solve for h or for d.
 
  • #6
Pressures along line 3 are equal.

Write an expression for the pressure in the left leg at line 3 at the interface. Do the same for where line 3 crosses the right leg. Equate them. You have introduced a new variable, d, but you'll see what happens when you solve for h.
 
  • #7
Pressure along line 3 = (13600kg/m^3)(9.81m/s)(0.25m) ?

I'm not sure what you're asking me to equate this to.
 
  • #8
The pressure consists of all the liquid above the point. I'm not asking for pressure along the line, I'm asking for pressure where the line crosses the leg of the U-tube. On the left leg you have three components making up the pressure.

You have 25 cm of hg.
You have a depth of water extending from line 2 to the surface of lower reservoir called d. d is an unknown.
You have a depth of water from surface of right reservoir to left reservoir surface. That depth is h, another unknown.

The pressure at the hg-water interface in the left leg is the sum of the above.


Now look at where this line, line 3, crosses the right leg of the U-tube. Write another equation for the pressure at that point. It will have two components. Since the pressures where line 3 crosses the U-tube must be equal, equate them and solve for h.
 
  • #9
So (25cm)(gravity)(density of Hg) + d(gravity)(water density) + h(gravity)(water density) = pressure at water-Hg interface in the left tube = pressure at equal point in right tube?
 
  • #10
Yes, you'll see that the d cancels out.
 
  • #11
How do I generate an equation for the point in the right tube?
 
  • #12
Sum the pressures of the sections of fluids that are above it. Same method as you did with left leg.
 
  • #13
(25cm)(gravity)(density of Hg) + d(gravity)(water density) + h(gravity)(water density) =

d(gravity)(water density) + h(gravity)(water density) ?

or maybe

(25cm)(gravity)(density of Hg) + d(gravity)(water density) + h(gravity)(water density) =

d(gravity)(water density) + h(gravity)(water density) + (25cm)(gravity)(water density) ?

Should there be a part about atmospheric pressure on the right?
 
  • #14
No, the last term on the RHS is wrong. What is the column of liquid above the intersection of line 3 and the surface of the reservoir on the right? You got part of it correct. It consists of two sections.
 
  • #15
Atmospheric pressure is on both reservoirs so it would cancel out.

What about the column of Hg on the right side of the manometer?
 
  • #16
(25cm)(gravity)(density of Hg) + d(gravity)(water density) + h(gravity)(water density) =

d(gravity)(water density) + h(gravity)(water density)

The term "h(gravity)(water density)" is wrong. It's the last term on the second line of your equation.

Going up the right leg you have "d(gravity)(water density)" and a mercury (Hg) component.
 
  • #17
(25cm)(gravity)(density of Hg) + d(gravity)(water density) + h(gravity)(water density) =

d(gravity)(water density) + (25cm)(gravity)(density of Hg)?

Wouldn't that just cancel out?

Just looking at it makes me think that I should use

(25cm)(gravity)(density of water) + d(gravity)(water density) + h(gravity)(water density) =

d(gravity)(water density) + (25cm)(gravity)(density of Hg)

Basically the pressure on the left side being caused by 25cm of water as opposed to 25cm of mercury

Yep, that works out.

Divide gravity out of everything, cancel the d term, then solve for h=3.15m.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(.25m)(1000kg/m^3) + h(1000kg/m^3) = (.25m)(13600kg/m^3)

h(1000kg/m^3)= 3150kg/m^2

h = 3.15m
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Yes, I misread your LHS from the previous page and indicated it was ok when it was not. I missed that.

Your second equation is correct. Problem done.
 

Related to Fluid Dynamics of two water reservoirs

1. What is fluid dynamics?

Fluid dynamics is the study of how fluids, such as liquids and gases, flow and interact with their surroundings.

2. How does fluid dynamics apply to two water reservoirs?

In the context of two water reservoirs, fluid dynamics would involve understanding how the water flows and behaves as it is transferred between the two reservoirs.

3. What factors affect the fluid dynamics of two water reservoirs?

There are several factors that can affect the fluid dynamics of two water reservoirs, including the difference in water levels between the two reservoirs, the size and shape of the connecting channel, and the viscosity of the water.

4. How can fluid dynamics be used to improve the efficiency of water transfer between two reservoirs?

By studying the fluid dynamics of two water reservoirs, scientists and engineers can identify potential areas for improvement, such as reducing turbulence or optimizing the size and shape of the connecting channel, to make the transfer process more efficient.

5. Are there any potential risks associated with the fluid dynamics of two water reservoirs?

Yes, there can be potential risks, such as water loss due to leaks or inefficient transfer, which can lead to water shortages in one or both reservoirs. Understanding and managing the fluid dynamics can help mitigate these risks.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
346
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
56
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top