Flux of Electric field through sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding electric flux through a sphere, highlighting that it is determined solely by the charges enclosed within the sphere, while external charges do not influence the flux. The initial calculation mistakenly included an external charge, leading to confusion. Gauss's law is introduced as the principle explaining that electric flux is related to the net charge inside a closed surface. An analogy is made comparing electric charges to sources and sinks of water, illustrating how flux behaves with enclosed and external charges. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that only enclosed charges affect the electric flux through a sphere, aligning with Gauss's law.
Tesla In Person
Messages
34
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
What is the flux of electric field through sphere with charges inside and outside of the sphere?
Relevant Equations
Electric field flux = Q/ e0
My attempt: We have 3 charges inside 2 +ve and 1 -ve so i just added them up. 4 + 5 +(-7) = 2q
Then there is a -5q charge outside the sphere. I did 2q + (-5q)= -3q . The electric field flux formula is Flux= q/ E0 . So i got -3q/E0 which is obviously wrong : ) . After quick googling , I discovered that the electric flux through a sphere is only dependent on charges enclosed by the sphere , charges outside don't affect electric flux through sphere. Is it correct and why it is the case? I am not familiar with Gauss' law so how do i get started. Thank you
 

Attachments

  • physics 5.PNG
    physics 5.PNG
    12.3 KB · Views: 157
Physics news on Phys.org
Tesla In Person said:
After quick googling , I discovered that the electric flux through a sphere is only dependent on charges enclosed by the sphere , charges outside don't affect electric flux through sphere. Is it correct and why it is the case?
That is Gauss’ law.
 
The sources of electric flux are charges. Think of them as sources (positive) and sinks (negative) of water. If a closed surfaces encloses source, water comes out of the surface at every point on it. Likewise, if a sink is enclosed, water goes into the surface at every point on it. If you have a combination of sources and sinks you need to add all the positives and negatives and see what the net is.

Now if a source is outside the surface and there are no sources or sinks enclosed by the surface, what goes into it through the side closer to the source must come out the other side. You put all this together and you have an intuitive understanding of Gauss's law.
 
  • Like
Likes Tesla In Person
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top