Flyback Converter Magnetic Flux Calculation

In summary, the core of the transformer saturates when the magnetic field density at the narrowest area of the core is greater than 217.032 mT. The peak current in the MOSFET becomes exponential, which means the core saturates. There might be something wrong with the calculation if the drain current waveform is not clean.
  • #1
BlackMelon
45
7
Hi

I am designing a flyback converter. The calculation (.jpg file) is based on Daniel W. Hart Power Electronics book. The transformer model consists only of an ideal transformer and its magnetizing inductance (or "primary inductance" in some textbooks).
The datasheet of the transformer's core is the pdf file "pq32_30". The other pdf file has details about the core's material (N87). So, I calculate the magnetic field density (B) at the narrowest area of the core. From this B value (217.032 mT) I do not expect to have any core saturation issue.

However, when I test the real circuit, I can see the peak of the MOSFET's drain current becoming exponential, which means the core saturates.

So, is there something wrong with my calculation?
 

Attachments

  • SaturationTrf.jpg
    SaturationTrf.jpg
    48.9 KB · Views: 132
  • N87 Saturation Data.pdf
    402.3 KB · Views: 112
  • pq_32_30.pdf
    358.7 KB · Views: 102
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Check the Drain current with the secondary open-circuit (no load, no filter cap). If the Drain current waveform is clean, your calculations did not include the load current.

edit: Or maybe the filter cap is shorted.
/edit;

Cheers,
Tom
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes BlackMelon
  • #3
I don't understand how you can expect us to figure this out without knowing the core dimensions (Ac & lm).Also, I calculated a quite different value of Ipk in the primary, 0.673A (assuming 100% efficiency). Although we nearly agree on the current change in the primary ##\Delta I_p##.

Anyway, I'll leave you with my favorite magnetics design equations, which are often all you need for this sort of problem:

## B=\mu H = \mu \frac{NI}{l_m} ##
## L= \mu \frac{N^2 A_c}{l_m} ##

You can combine these to show that ##B=\frac{LI}{NA_c}##.

##A_c## is the effective core area.
##l_m## is the effective magnetic path length.

PS: Oops, I see the core is specified in your attachments. You'll get better (more) feedback if you really show your work better without making us look for it. Anyway with ##A_c =153.8 mm^2## I calculated ##B_{max} = 0.16T## which should be fine for ferrite. Of course it's actually a bit higher since your efficiency isn't 100%.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes BlackMelon
  • #4
How does the slope ##\frac{dI}{dt}## of the primary current compare to the expected value ##\frac{V_{in}}{L_m}## initially before the slope increases with saturation? This will tell you if the magnetizing inductance (i.e. air gap, turns, etc) is what you expected. How does the measured peak current compare to your calculations when you see saturation? Somewhere, your assumptions must be wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes BlackMelon
  • #5
Hi All,
Actually, I figure it out why it saturates. The center of the transformer core (area named Ae) got the highest flux density, not its wing (even the wing's area is smaller than the center, it has much lesser flux). Please see my calculation on the mediafire link below. First, let me summarize/answers major concerns of each guy in here.
Tom: I include the load current. (actually, the increasing load current will increase the mean value of Lm)
DaveE: For B = LI/(NAc) I use "flux = LI/N" where flux is B*Ac. Same equation.
dI/dt and Vin/Lm is normal before saturation
See my calculation on the images.

https://www.mediafire.com/file/xsmzea322c2lull/Page1FB.jpg/file
https://www.mediafire.com/file/fzw9wnw0r0k57fj/Page2FB.jpg/file
I have attached some pages from Daniel Hart Power Electronics to show the proof of the formula I used. See the pdf file on attachment
 

Attachments

  • Flyback Converter Daniel W. Hart.pdf
    327.9 KB · Views: 132
Last edited:

FAQ: Flyback Converter Magnetic Flux Calculation

What is the basic principle of a flyback converter?

A flyback converter operates by storing energy in a magnetic field within an inductor or transformer during the switch-on period and then releasing that energy to the load during the switch-off period. This process allows for efficient voltage conversion and isolation between input and output.

How do you calculate the primary inductance for a flyback transformer?

The primary inductance, Lp, can be calculated using the formula Lp = (Vin * D * T) / Ipk, where Vin is the input voltage, D is the duty cycle, T is the switching period, and Ipk is the peak primary current. This ensures that the transformer stores the correct amount of energy for the given application.

What role does magnetic flux play in a flyback converter?

Magnetic flux in a flyback converter is crucial as it determines the energy storage capability of the transformer. During the switch-on period, the magnetic flux builds up in the core, and during the switch-off period, it collapses, transferring energy to the secondary winding and ultimately to the load.

How do you calculate the maximum magnetic flux density in a flyback transformer core?

The maximum magnetic flux density, Bmax, can be calculated using Bmax = (Vin * D) / (N * Ae * f), where Vin is the input voltage, D is the duty cycle, N is the number of primary turns, Ae is the effective core area, and f is the switching frequency. This helps in ensuring the core does not saturate.

What factors should be considered when selecting a core material for a flyback transformer?

When selecting a core material for a flyback transformer, factors such as core saturation flux density, permeability, core loss, thermal stability, and cost should be considered. The material should support the required magnetic flux without saturating and should have low core losses to maintain efficiency.

Back
Top