For SOP-detrimental to mention field that doesn't exist yet? (nanorobotics)

  • Thread starter cjw21
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Field
In summary, the individual is questioning whether it is detrimental to mention their long-term research goal of developing the field of biomedical nanorobotics in their SOP. They are concerned that mentioning this may come across as buying into media hype and are considering speaking more vaguely about related topics. They also mention the importance of aligning their SOP with the university's focus and goals.
  • #1
cjw21
6
0
For SOP--detrimental to mention field that doesn't exist yet? (nanorobotics)

Just a quick question. My very long-term research goal is to help develop the field of biomedical nanorobotics, which is something that obviously isn't even close to realization. Because of this, and the bad wrap nanobots seem to have gotten in terms of not being possible, people's imaginations going too far, and becoming just a word the media drops to sound fancy, I have avoided mentioning this in my SOP. Instead, I have just been speaking more vaguely in terms of developing very small nanoelectronics components, propulsion techniques, and self-assembly methods. I'm concerned if I mention nanorobotics, the admissions committee will feel that I've bought into media hype. Am I reading this wrong and it would be advantageous to mention up-front my research goals, or am I better off playing it safe? Thanks for any advice...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


cjw21 said:
I'm concerned if I mention nanorobotics, the admissions committee will feel that I've bought into media hype. Am I reading this wrong and it would be advantageous to mention up-front my research goals, or am I better off playing it safe? Thanks for any advice...

One thing that you need to think about is that if your long term goals is to work on something that doesn't exist, what can you do now (or next year) that will bring you toward that goal.

Also, you should gear your SOP toward your university. If the website for the university mentions nano-robots explicitly then it's probably safe to do it in your SOP. If not, then you have to figure out how your long term goals fit in with what the university is trying to do right now.
 

FAQ: For SOP-detrimental to mention field that doesn't exist yet? (nanorobotics)

What is nanorobotics?

Nanorobotics is a technology that focuses on creating and controlling microscopic robots, also known as nanobots, at the nanoscale level (1-100 nanometers). These robots have the potential to perform complex tasks such as delivering drugs to specific cells in the body or repairing damaged tissues.

How does nanorobotics relate to SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures)?

SOPs are essential in any field of scientific research, including nanorobotics. They provide a set of instructions and guidelines for performing experiments and handling materials safely and efficiently. In the case of nanorobotics, SOPs are crucial for ensuring the proper design, fabrication, and operation of nanobots to achieve desired results.

3. Is mentioning a non-existent field in an SOP detrimental?

Yes, mentioning a field that does not exist yet in an SOP can be detrimental. SOPs are meant to be precise and based on established procedures and protocols. Including a field that is not yet developed can lead to confusion and compromise the accuracy and effectiveness of the SOP.

4. Can nanorobotics be considered a field that doesn't exist yet?

No, nanorobotics is a field that already exists and has been actively researched and developed for several decades. However, it is still a relatively new and rapidly advancing field, with many potential applications and challenges yet to be explored.

5. How can mentioning a non-existent field in an SOP impact the research process?

Mentioning a non-existent field in an SOP can impact the research process in several ways. It can lead to confusion and misunderstandings among team members, delay the progress of the research, and potentially compromise the safety and accuracy of the experiments. It is crucial to only include established and relevant fields in an SOP to ensure the success of the research.

Similar threads

Admissions How explicit should my goals be in my Statement of Purpose?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Admissions Need advice for my personal statement
Replies
27
Views
3K
Unsure about Content of Statement of Purpose
Replies
6
Views
3K
Admissions Concerned About My SOP For Physics PhD Admission
Replies
6
Views
9K
Nano- Vs. Bio-, Technology Vs. Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
I love HEP Theory, but doubts about future.
Replies
4
Views
2K
What are Joe's interests and goals as a new member and citizen scientist?
Replies
2
Views
591
Other Is a PhD in Biomedical Engineering the Best Path for My Career Goals?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Programs Advice for pursuing PhD in the US
Replies
5
Views
3K
How Does Physics Connect Diverse Scientific Fields?
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top