Force Decomposition: Exploring the Physics

In summary, the conversation discusses decomposing forces and the use of components to describe them. It is important to treat force as a vector and not just add the magnitudes of the components, as direction matters.
  • #1
ErikD
9
0
[PLAIN]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7a/Friction.png

I can decompose W to get Fn and -Fr.

Fn = W cos([tex]\theta[/tex])
-Fr = W sin([tex]\theta[/tex])

I know I'm allowed to decompose forces like that but I'm a bit confused as to why. Cause |Fn| + |Fr| > |W| (for the angle in this picture). So by decomposing W am I not introducing force that isn't there?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ErikD said:
I can decompose W to get Fn and -Fr.

Fn = W cos([tex]\theta[/tex])
-Fr = W sin([tex]\theta[/tex])
I don't quite understand your diagram. What's Fr? Is the block in equilibrium?

You can certainly write any vector in terms of its components.

I know I'm allowed to decompose forces like that but I'm a bit confused as to why. Cause |Fn| + |Fr| > |W| (for the angle in this picture).
I don't understand the significance of adding the magnitudes of these components. The sum of the magnitudes of the components will be greater than the magnitude of the vector itself. So?
So by decomposing W am I not introducing force that isn't there?
No. You're just describing the same force in a different way. Nothing's been added or removed.
 
  • #3
Sorry I should have been a bit more clear. Yes the block is in equilibrium. Fr is the force of friction. Fr = W sin([tex]\theta[/tex]) so the block isn't moving.

Isn't the magnitude of a force the amount of Newtons the force is strong? So don't the magnitudes of the components have more Newtons than the force itself?
 
  • #4
ErikD said:
Sorry I should have been a bit more clear. Yes the block is in equilibrium. Fr is the force of friction. Fr = W sin([tex]\theta[/tex]) so the block isn't moving.
OK.

Isn't the magnitude of a force the amount of Newtons the force is strong?
Sure.

So don't the magnitudes of the components have more Newtons than the force itself?
You mean "Is the sum of the magnitudes of the components greater than the magnitude of the force itself?" Sure! So what?

Note that the components are in different directions--they are perpendicular to each other--so adding the magnitudes has no special meaning. Only adding them as vectors has any meaning.

The moral is that you must treat force as a vector, not a scalar. Given two vectors (in this case, the components of the weight) you must add them as vectors to find the total. You can't just add the magnitudes. Direction matters! (Take two 10 N forces. Depending on their directions, the total of those forces can be anything from 0 N to 20 N. Adding the magnitudes only makes sense if they point in the same direction.)
 
  • #5
Thanks, that clears up my confusion.
 

FAQ: Force Decomposition: Exploring the Physics

What is force decomposition?

Force decomposition is the process of breaking down a single force into its components in order to better understand and analyze its effects on an object. This is done by determining the magnitude and direction of each component force.

Why is force decomposition important in physics?

Force decomposition allows us to understand the individual effects of multiple forces acting on an object, and how they contribute to the overall motion and behavior of the object. It also helps us to accurately calculate and predict the resulting motion of an object.

How is force decomposition used in real-world applications?

Force decomposition is used in various fields, such as engineering, architecture, and sports. For example, in bridge design, engineers use force decomposition to determine the individual forces acting on different parts of the bridge to ensure its stability. In sports, understanding force decomposition can help athletes optimize their movements for maximum performance.

What are the types of force decomposition?

The two main types of force decomposition are rectangular and polar decomposition. Rectangular decomposition breaks down a force into horizontal and vertical components, while polar decomposition breaks it down into radial and tangential components.

How is force decomposition related to Newton's laws of motion?

Force decomposition is closely related to Newton's laws of motion, specifically the first and second laws. The first law states that an object at rest remains at rest and an object in motion remains in motion with a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. Force decomposition helps us to understand and analyze the external forces acting on an object. The second law states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting on it and inversely proportional to its mass. Force decomposition allows us to calculate the net force on an object by breaking it down into its component forces.

Similar threads

Back
Top