Force Gain & Distance Loss: Explaining a Machine as Force Multiplier

  • Thread starter Thread starter redXI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing
AI Thread Summary
A machine acts as a force multiplier by producing an output force greater than the input force, with the trade-off being a loss in distance. This principle is illustrated through examples like pulleys and hydraulic lifts, where less force is needed to lift heavy objects, but more distance must be covered. In cycling, shifting to a higher gear requires more force but results in greater distance per pedal stroke, while lower gears allow for easier pedaling at the cost of distance covered. The relationship between force and distance is governed by the conservation of energy, where the work done remains constant. Understanding this concept is essential for effectively utilizing machines in various applications.
redXI
2
0
"When a machine is used as force multiplier, the output force is larger than the input force. The force gain is paid by the distance loss."

I still don't get it. All I know is that this thing got to do with bikes? Correct me if I'm wrong. o:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reminds me of pulleys. You can lift a heavy object by pulling a rope hanging over some pulleys. You can lift the object with half the force needed without a pulley, but twice as much rope (length) will pass through your hands as the height gained by the object. This is simply because the total energy gained by the object (mgh) is equal to the work you have done W=Fd. You can make F smaller, but d becomes larger in the same proportion.
The same thing applies in a hydrolic lift, or a jack. You can lift heavy object by doing work on the lever, but you have to move the lever up and down maybe 20 times for the object (car of whatever) to raise half a meter.
In a bike the same sort of principle applies. If you shift in higher gear you have to push hard on the pedals, but you'll move a great distance in one cycle. If you're in a very low gear you have to cycle lots of times to get some push forwards, but it's much lighter.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top