- #1
- 19,551
- 10,299
Ford, Gosling, Leto. Can't wait!
Are you referring to Roy's part at the end about tears in the rain?Noisy Rhysling said:Do you know which parts of the dialog in the original were ad lib?
Yep.BillTre said:Much better trailer than the ones that were around for a few months!Are you referring to Roy's part at the end about tears in the rain?
are you posting from the future? Currently Ford is still alive, at least according to my subjective present.Noisy Rhysling said:I was seriously wondering if Harrison did his parts before he died. I got to lay off the comic book movies.
I was referring to his dispute with his son, Kylo.DHF said:are you posting from the future? Currently Ford is still alive, at least according to my subjective present.
Khashishi said:I'm apprehensive. It's hard to pull off a sequel to a cult classic. Blade Runner leaves some open questions which makes you think about it. I'm worried that it will be turned into a simple good vs evil or save the world action flick.
Have you seen 'The modern adventures of Han and Ben'?Noisy Rhysling said:I was referring to his dispute with his son, Kylo.
StatGuy2000 said:... if there is a reason to be optimistic, this new film will be directed by acclaimed Quebecois (i.e. French-Canadian) filmmaker Denis Villeneuve, who has had an impressive resume thus far with both his earlier French language films (Polytechnique, Incendies) as well as his English-language films (Prisoners, Enemy, Sicario, and Arrival in particular). If any filmmaker will be able to pull off a thought-provoking sci-fi film in the manner of the original Blade Runner, it would be Villeneuve.
OmCheeto said:I watch about 1 "new" movie about every 5 years.
Have you seen more than 10?OmCheeto said:The original Bladerunner is one of my 10 favorite movies.
Thousands. I just wait for them to come out on internet. Very few movies will make me skip the pause button.Bandersnatch said:Have you seen more than 10?
Looks like they remade the original replicant concept into Asimov's robots.BillTre said:I just came upon this short clip.
It is supposed to give background for the new Blade Runner movie.
The new Tyrell (Niander Wallace) is explaining about his new replicants.
What makes you think he did? Do you believe he thought he was really writing future history instead of just a story out of his imagination?Blue Scallop said:... why did the writer in 1982 thought we could have replicants by year 2019?
His imaginationWhat was his source?
That's just sillyor maybe we already have replicants hiding among us (remember the Grey hybrids stories circulating around)?
phinds said:What makes you think he did? Do you believe he thought he was really writing future history instead of just a story out of his imagination?
His imagination That's just silly
BillTre said:I saw it also. In IMAX, Thursday night. Not many people there.
I liked it. Very cinematic (visually good). Interesting story. The short videos I linked to above will help understanding of what is going on in the movie.
It is not a fast moving film through, but you can get sucked into it if you are patient.
Differences are (not spoilers):
- the existence of replicants is widely acknowledged if the film,
- the issue of replicant emotions is more obviously dealt with.
FYI, there is a bazillion of cuts out there. Well, ok, maybe three main cuts. There's the theatrical cut with the intentionally hammy voiceover (avoid!), the one without it (preferred version in my opinion), and the one with the unicorn (one extra scene alters the whole film - arguably more in line with the short story it was based on, but less coherent as a purely cinematic experience).Blue Scallop said:I will first watch the old Blade Runner later in video to be familiar with the story
Blade Runner (30th Anniversary Collector's Edition) [Blu-ray] by Warner Home VideoBandersnatch said:FYI, there is a bazillion of cuts out there. Well, ok, maybe three main cuts. There's the theatrical cut with the intentionally hammy voiceover (avoid!), the one without it (preferred version in my opinion), and the one with the unicorn (one extra scene alters the whole film - arguably more in line with the short story it was based on, but less coherent as a purely cinematic experience).