- #1
mouseonmoon
Former Canadian Defense Minister
what's interesting here?=the guy (Paul Hellyer) changes his mind about 'speaking out' because of the Peter Jennings Special--well...who's to follow?
The former Defense Minister then reads Corso' s book (Day After Roswell-names names, dates etc. that can be 'checked'--but it's a book 'scoffed at', right?--and then "He contacted a retired United States Air Force General and spoke to him directly to verify Corso's claims. The unnamed General
simply said: "every word is true and more"."
<who you going to trust-ghost busters?>
"and <the> more" stuff was discussed...
being (in the military mind-set): ET = "enemy"---
ergo we need more and better weapons;
but is ET a 'threat'? Gov's always said no- there's no 'proof'
that ET's been visiting===(does this 'add up'?)
What if he's just 'exploring'--found us and finds us 'interesting'?
but,yet another 'un-named source'==the General.
But why won't he come forward/out in the 'open'--
it's the same ol' same ol'.
Why's Bush really want to go to the Moon?
(simply because Ruskies can't stop us,and now US will have
all the Green Cheese)
Source: http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-38.htm
Michael E. Salla, PhD
Sept 29, 2005
http://www.exopolitics.org
I've spoken to the man-he's a Prof. at AU--but this is his 'personal
endeavor'...and 'in person' it seems his argument is:there's an awlful lot of smoke;no body sees what's going on...
He asks questions-and people think he's making statements...wierd.
another cheesy trap? is Paul just a hell-raiser?
mouseonamoon
what's interesting here?=the guy (Paul Hellyer) changes his mind about 'speaking out' because of the Peter Jennings Special--well...who's to follow?
The former Defense Minister then reads Corso' s book (Day After Roswell-names names, dates etc. that can be 'checked'--but it's a book 'scoffed at', right?--and then "He contacted a retired United States Air Force General and spoke to him directly to verify Corso's claims. The unnamed General
simply said: "every word is true and more"."
<who you going to trust-ghost busters?>
"and <the> more" stuff was discussed...
being (in the military mind-set): ET = "enemy"---
ergo we need more and better weapons;
but is ET a 'threat'? Gov's always said no- there's no 'proof'
that ET's been visiting===(does this 'add up'?)
What if he's just 'exploring'--found us and finds us 'interesting'?
but,yet another 'un-named source'==the General.
But why won't he come forward/out in the 'open'--
it's the same ol' same ol'.
Why's Bush really want to go to the Moon?
(simply because Ruskies can't stop us,and now US will have
all the Green Cheese)
Source: http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-38.htm
Michael E. Salla, PhD
Sept 29, 2005
http://www.exopolitics.org
I've spoken to the man-he's a Prof. at AU--but this is his 'personal
endeavor'...and 'in person' it seems his argument is:there's an awlful lot of smoke;no body sees what's going on...
He asks questions-and people think he's making statements...wierd.
another cheesy trap? is Paul just a hell-raiser?
mouseonamoon