Fourier transform of PSD

  • Thread starter Thread starter mad mathematician
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Power Spectral Density (PSD) and the Fourier Transform (FT) of the Autocorrelation function, emphasizing that PSD is derived from the FT. Participants explore potential applications of applying the FT to PSD in electrical engineering (EE), noting that it can help understand harmonic content and evaluate power spectra. The conversation touches on the mathematical intricacies of performing sequential Fourier transforms and their implications, particularly in analyzing spatial frequencies in 2D images. Additionally, concepts like Parseval's Theorem are mentioned as relevant to EE applications. Overall, the exploration of Fourier transforms in relation to PSD reveals both theoretical interest and practical implications in signal processing.
mad mathematician
103
15
So PSD is the Fourier transform of the Autocorrelation function.
Is there any application of the Fourier transform on PSD in EE?
Or it's like in Newtonian dynamics a second derivative wrt time is as far as we can get (more than that it's called a Jerk...).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
mad mathematician said:
Is there any application of the Fourier transform on PSD in EE?
If you think it will help you to understand the harmonic content, then there is an application.

Each application of the FT, folds the signal between the time and the frequency domains. Inverse transforms return things in time sequence, while two sequential forward transforms, does not seem to make much sense, but can be useful if you are computing the spatial frequencies of 2D images.

Most of the useful transforms evaluate the power spectrum, maybe take the log, then fold the frequency domain back into the time domain using the IFT. Searching for echos is one application.

There is plenty of Fourier space to explore, and a whole inverted vocabulary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepstrum
 
mad mathematician said:
So PSD is the Fourier transform of the Autocorrelation function.
Is there any application of the Fourier transform on PSD in EE?
Or it's like in Newtonian dynamics a second derivative wrt time is as far as we can get (more than that it's called a Jerk...).
You might take a look at Parseval's Theorem and it's application in electrical engineering.
 
mad mathematician said:
So PSD is the Fourier transform of the Autocorrelation function.
Is there any application of the Fourier transform on PSD in EE?
The Fourier Transform transforms a function of time into a function of frequencies. How can you then transform that function of frequencies into another function of frequencies using a Fourier Transform?
 
berkeman said:
The Fourier Transform transforms a function of time into a function of frequencies. How can you then transform that function of frequencies into another function of frequencies using a Fourier Transform?
Well, mathematically what I had in mind is as follows:
Given the autocorrelation function , then the PSD is , another fourier transform: ; one can change variables in the integration as follows: , and then to calcualte the Jacobian determinant w.r.t u and v.

I don't know of any applications to this "bizzare" operation, just something that I thought about.
In the introduction to Harmonic Analysis course that I took more than 10 years ago there was some theorem
of Thorin which seems relevant to my idea of repeating the Fourier transform.

So I guess it's part nostalgia part concerning me nowadays in my EE studies.
 
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...

Similar threads

Back
Top