MHB Fraction multiplication problem

AI Thread Summary
To multiply the fraction $\frac{3}{7}$ by two, the correct method is to express it as $2 \left(\frac{3}{7}\right) = \frac{2 \cdot 3}{1 \cdot 7} = \frac{6}{7}$. The initial methods discussed, including $2\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ and $\frac{2}{2}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$, are incorrect because they misrepresent the multiplication process. Method 2 incorrectly multiplies by 1, while method 1 unnecessarily alters the denominator. The key takeaway is that when multiplying a fraction by an integer, only the numerator should be multiplied, resulting in $\frac{6}{7}$.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
This problem is a little elementary,

If we were to multiply the fraction $\frac{3}{7}$ by two which way should I be using,

$2\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 1

or

$\frac{2}{2}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 2

I usually multiply fractions using the method in 1 But looks like It is wrong,

$\frac{2}{1}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ which is incorrect

I have been used to multiply fractions using the method in 1, So which one of them are correct to multiply $\frac{3}{7}$ by two
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
This problem is a little elementary,

If we were to multiply the fraction $\frac{3}{7}$ by two which way should I be using,

$2\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 1

or

$\frac{2}{2}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 2

I usually multiply fractions using the method in 1 But looks like It is wrong,

$\frac{2}{1}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ which is incorrect

I have been used to multiply fractions using the method in 1, So which one of them are correct to multiply $\frac{3}{7}$ by two

Number 2 is wrong because since you have $\dfrac{2}{2}$ you are multiplying by 1 instead of by 2.

Number 1 is also incorrect, what you're doing below when trying it out is to multiply top and bottom by 2 which is the same method as the incorrect "equation" 2 - you're going from 7 to 14 in the denominator for no reason

$\frac{2}{1}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ which is incorrect



What you should be doing is:

$2 \left(\dfrac{3}{7}\right) = \dfrac{2}{1} \cdot \dfrac{3}{7} = \dfrac{2 \cdot 3}{1 \cdot 7} = \dfrac{6}{7}$

edit: if you have an integer (or something not written in fractional form - for example $e$ or $\pi$) you multiply only by the numerator
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top