Frequency of oscillation of a rod with two springs

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the frequency of oscillation of a rod supported by two springs. The initial analysis assumes both springs are equally elongated in equilibrium, leading to a derived equation of motion. However, further examination reveals that the elongations of the springs are not equal due to torque considerations, indicating a need for a more comprehensive analysis that includes both torque and force. The correct frequency of oscillation is ultimately derived as ω = √(15k/4m) based on this refined understanding. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of considering both torque and force in rigid body motion analysis.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement



upload_2017-8-16_11-8-50.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Let's take that in equilibrium, both springs S_l and S_r are elongated by ##x_e##.
Assuming that the oscillations are so small that the springs could be taken along x- axis approximately.
At time t, S_l is elongated by x. The rod makes an angle ## \theta ## with vertical axis such that
## \tan \theta = \frac x {\frac l 2 }
##
This gives that the S_r will be elongated by x' = ## 2 \tan \theta = 2x ##

Eqn. of motion of com gives,
## k ( x_e + x ) (-\hat x ) +k (x_e -2x) \hat x = m \ddot x \hat x ##
## -3kx = m\ddot x##
## \omega = \sqrt (\frac {3k} m )##

Is this correct so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another attempt:
Motivated from the OP's solution,
Torque eqn. about the pivot-point,
## k ( x_e + x ) \frac l 2 (-\hat z ) +k (x_e -2x) l \hat z= I \ddot \theta \hat z ##
But in equilibrium, the above eqn. gives me non-zero net torque, so it means that the elongation is not same for both the springs.
Let's say that in equilibrium, LHS elongation is ##x_{le} ## and RHS elongtion is ## x_{re}##, and ## x_{le } ≠ x_{re} ## . But these elongations are such that the net torque on the system about the pivot is zero in the equilibrium
But, this tells that net force acting on the com is non - zero in equilb. { A CONTRADICTION ?}

## \tan \theta = \frac {2x } l
\\ \text{ for small , } \theta ,
\\ \tan \theta≈ \theta
\ddot \theta = \frac {2 \ddot x} l##
So,
## k x \frac l 2 (-\hat z ) +k ( -2x) l \hat z= I \ddot \theta \hat z = \frac {ml^2}3 (\frac {2 \ddot x} l) ##
## \frac { -5} 2 kx = \frac 2 3 m \ddot x ##
## \omega = \sqrt {(\frac {15 k} {4 m}) }##

But how to decide the correctness of both the solutions?
 
Pushoam said:
in equilibrium, both springs S_l and S_r are elongated by xe.
Is that possible? What would the two torques about the pivot be?
 
haruspex said:
Is that possible?
No, it is not.
In the OP, I thought that it were only springs which were exerting forces along x-axis. Consequently, forces by them should be equal in magnitude in eqbm and so their elongation.
But, torque analysis in post #2 says that it is not so.
SO, I think the HINGE also exert force along x-axis to make the center of mass in eqbm. I missed it.

LEARNING: IN CASE OF RIGID BODY MOTION, I SHOULD DO BOTH TORQUE AND FORCE ANALYSIS BEFORE GOING AHEAD.
So, the solution in post #2 is correct.
Is this correct so far?
 
Pushoam said:
the solution in post #2 is correct.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
Thanks.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K