Friction between tractor tyres and the ground

  • Thread starter Thread starter laser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces acting on a tractor as it pulls a load uphill. The net force exerted by the tractor is calculated as 8.44x10^3 N, but questions arise about whether the tractor's friction should be considered in this calculation. It is clarified that the tractor's static friction with the ground is essential for movement, functioning as an accelerating force rather than a resistance. The conversation emphasizes that the static friction adjusts to match the tension in the rope, allowing the tractor to pull the load without slipping. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that the tractor's friction is crucial for its ability to exert force and move the load effectively.
laser
Messages
104
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
See description
Relevant Equations
F=ma
1702045598887.png

So in (a) the answer is just mgsintheta.

When doing (b), I got 8.44x10^3N to be the NET force the tractor must exert. Does the tractor not need to overcome its own friction as well? If so, shouldn't the equation be F_tractor = F_exerted - F_friction, and the question is asking for F_exerted?

How I got 8.44x10^3: a = 0, therefore mgcostheta*Uk +mgsintheta = F_tractor. So the tractor is applying a net force of 8.44x10^3. But why are we not considering its friction? Consider my previous point.

Given that the coefficient of friction between the tractor's tyres and the ground is not given, can I assume it is frictionless? But then, how are the wheels meant to rotate? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
laser said:
So in (a) the answer is just mgsintheta.
Which, of course, you checked agains ##\mu N## ?

laser said:
Does the tractor not need to overcome its own friction as well?
Yes

laser said:
If so, shouldn't the equation be F_tractor = F_exerted - F_friction, and the question is asking for F_exerted?
Apparently the exercise composer considers Ftractor to be the net available traction force you call Fexerted
##\ ##
 
laser said:
Does the tractor not need to overcome its own friction as well?
What does that mean? As you say, the tractor would be unable to pull on the rope if it were on frictionless ice. It's the external force of static friction between the tyres and the ground that propels the (tractor + rope + logs) system forward.

Think of it this way. There is no friction to "overcome" before engaging the gears that transmit the engine power to the wheels ." This situation is unlike a fish swimming upstream that has to overcome a current. The only static friction that must be overcome is between the box of logs and the ground not between the tractor's tyres and the ground. Static friction adjusts itself to provide the observed acceleration but only up to a point that cannot be exceeded.

Here, as the tension in the rope increases while nothing moves the force of static friction at the box and the tyres match the tension. In order for the tractor to pull the box up the slope, the upper limit of static friction at the box must be less than the upper limit of static friction at the tyres. If it isn't, the tyres will start spinning before the box is pulled uphill. See how it works?
laser said:
How I got 8.44x10^3: a = 0, therefore mgcostheta*Uk +mgsintheta = F_tractor. So the tractor is applying a net force of 8.44x10^3. But why are we not considering its friction? Consider my previous point.
Your cavalier use of "net force" might lead you into trouble. According to Newton's second law ##F_{\text{net}}=ma.## You cannot have a non-zero force when the acceleration is zero. What you have computed is the force exerted by the tractor on the rope a.k.a. the tension in the rope.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR, scottdave and laser
laser said:
Homework Statement: See description
Relevant Equations: F=ma

View attachment 336895
So in (a) the answer is just mgsintheta.

When doing (b), I got 8.44x10^3N to be the NET force the tractor must exert. Does the tractor not need to overcome its own friction as well? If so, shouldn't the equation be F_tractor = F_exerted - F_friction, and the question is asking for F_exerted?

How I got 8.44x10^3: a = 0, therefore mgcostheta*Uk +mgsintheta = F_tractor. So the tractor is applying a net force of 8.44x10^3. But why are we not considering its friction? Consider my previous point.

Given that the coefficient of friction between the tractor's tyres and the ground is not given, can I assume it is frictionless? But then, how are the wheels meant to rotate? :)
The static friction between the tractor's tyres and the ground are what allows it to move. It's an accelerating force, not a force of resistance. That's how wheels work. And, that's how walking works as well.

There may be some rolling resistance that is being neglected. But definitely not the friction that applies to a sliding object.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR, Lnewqban and laser
laser said:
How I got 8.44x10^3: a = 0, therefore mgcostheta*Uk +mgsintheta = F_tractor. So the tractor is applying a net force of 8.44x10^3. But why are we not considering its friction? Consider my previous point.
Following the same logic that led you to calculate a), the net force is exactly the force of static friction exerted on the tires by the ground after the tractor starts to pull: 8451 Newtons.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top