FRW Model Q: Why Does Positive (ρ+3p) Prove Big Bang?

  • Thread starter Auburnman
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Model
In summary, the FRW Model says that if the combination of (ρ + 3p) is always positive then it proves the existence of a big bang like singularity in the past.
  • #1
Auburnman
11
0
So I've been reading a bunch about the FRW metric and doing FRW dynamics. I had a quick theory question involving the FRW Model in general. So in the Friedmann equations why is it that if the combination of (ρ + 3p) is always positive then it somehow proves the existence of a big bang like singularity in the past?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I assume you're referring to the second Friedmann equation, which (in units where G = c = 1, and with zero cosmological constant) looks like this:

[tex]\frac{1}{a} \frac{d^2 a}{dt^2} = - \frac{4 \pi}{3} \left( \rho + 3 p \right)[/tex]

Suppose that at some time [itex]t_0[/itex], which we could call "now" :wink:, we have that [itex]a > 0[/itex] and [itex]da /dt > 0[/itex]. This says that the Universe has some nonzero "size" (the scale factor a is a measure of "how large" the Universe is, though there are some technicalities with that that we probably don't need to get into here), and that it is expanding--i.e., to the future of [itex]t_0[/itex], a(t) will increase.

Now follow the history of the Universe into the past, given those conditions at [itex]t_0[/itex]. In the past direction, the Universe is contracting; and if [itex]\rho + 3 p[/itex] is positive, then [itex]d^2 a / dt^2[/itex] is negative, meaning that as we go into the past, the contraction of the universe "accelerates". That is enough to ensure that at some finite time in the past, we will reach a = 0, which is the Big Bang singularity.
 
  • #3
Although this is fine as far as it goes, you have to be careful not to oversell it, because it's only an argument that applies to the perfectly symmetric FRW model you're working with. The real universe lacks that perfect symmetry, so you really need the Hawking singularity theorem plus some observational constraints to prove that there was a singularity in the past.
 

FAQ: FRW Model Q: Why Does Positive (ρ+3p) Prove Big Bang?

What is the FRW Model?

The FRW (Friedmann-Robertson-Walker) model is a mathematical framework used to describe the expansion of the universe. It is based on the idea that the universe is homogeneous (uniform) and isotropic (looks the same in all directions) on large scales.

How does the FRW model support the Big Bang theory?

The FRW model predicts that the universe is expanding, which is a key component of the Big Bang theory. It also explains the observed cosmic microwave background radiation, which is considered to be leftover radiation from the Big Bang.

What is positive (ρ+3p) and why is it important in the FRW model?

In the FRW model, (ρ+3p) represents the total energy density of the universe, where ρ is the matter density and p is the pressure. This quantity is important because it determines the rate of expansion of the universe. A positive value for (ρ+3p) indicates that the universe is expanding, which is consistent with the Big Bang theory.

How is positive (ρ+3p) evidence for the Big Bang?

According to the FRW model, a positive value for (ρ+3p) leads to an expanding universe. This supports the Big Bang theory, which states that the universe began as a singularity and has been expanding ever since. Additionally, observations such as the redshift of galaxies and the cosmic microwave background radiation also support the idea of an expanding universe.

Are there any challenges to using the FRW model to support the Big Bang theory?

While the FRW model is the most widely accepted mathematical framework for describing the expansion of the universe, it is not without its limitations. For example, the model assumes a perfectly homogeneous and isotropic universe, which may not be entirely accurate. Additionally, the model does not account for the effects of dark matter and dark energy, which are believed to make up a large portion of the universe's energy density.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top