B Fulcrum point loads

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter rodgthedodge
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Adding an ebike to the rear carrier of a motorhome increases the load on the rear axle significantly more than the bike's weight. The calculation involves using moments to determine the additional weight on the rear wheels, which is found to be approximately 57 kg. This weight is derived from the distance of the ebike from the front axle and the forces involved. The front axle weight decreases slightly, but the focus remains on the rear axle's increased load. Proper calculations are essential for safe weight distribution in motorhomes.
rodgthedodge
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
I have a motorhome and I want to calculate the extra weight I am applying to my rear axle by adding my ebike to the rear carrier. I have searched and found a counterbalance formula (added in the image) my question is do I just add the CBW to the fulcrum point. i.e rear axle weight calculation = 1900kgs +35kgs+21.85kgs new rear axle weight = 1956kgs, confused? confused.
cbw.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Adding the 35 kg ebike to the rear will add more than 35 kg to the rear axle.
It will also reduce the weight on the front axle by less than 35 kg.

What are the axle weights now ?
 
Welcome, @rodgthedodge !
Can you add the counterweight further forward?
Any way to improve the rear suspension?
 
rodgthedodge said:
I have a motorhome and I want to calculate the extra weight I am applying to my rear axle by adding my ebike to the rear carrier.
Your calculation is correct, but confusing. Since you only want to calculate the extra weight from the ebike, you can ignore the weight of the motorhome. We do this by summing moments. A moment is a force multiplied by the distance from that force to a point. We can put that point where we want, so we choose that point so as to make the calculation as easy as possible. Since we want to find the extra weight on the rear wheels, that point will be the front wheels. The free body diagram then looks as follows:
Ebike FBD.jpg

The moment for the ebike is 6.5 m X 35 kg = 227.5 kg-m. The rear wheel load is unknown, but shown in the opposite direction, so we name it F, and the moment is 4 m X F = 4F kg-m. The sum of moments equals zero, so 227.5 - 4F = 0. Solve for F, and F = 227.5 / 4 = 56.875 kg. Round to the nearest kg, and the additional load is 57 kg. You can add that to the weight on the rear wheels to get the total weight on the rear wheels with the ebike.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top