Fundamental doubt on Acceleration.

In summary, acceleration means that the force is perpendicular to the velocity of the body. This is the same whether the body is moving with a constant speed or changing direction.
  • #1
PhysicsBegner
23
0
Hi Everyone, I have very fundamental question on Acceleration. I can understand that a moving body accelerates or de-accelerate when its velocity goes up and down.

But I couldn't understand; when we say a moving body accelrates or de-accelerates when the direction of moving body changes(with constant velocity). What acceleration literally means here?

I can understand mathematically since velocity is a vector we get acceleration whenever magnitude or direction changes. But I couldn't understand logically what acceleration means here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
PhysicsBegner said:
Hi Everyone, I have very fundamental question on Acceleration. I can understand that a moving body accelerates or de-accelerate when its velocity goes up and down.

But I couldn't understand; when we say a moving body accelrates or de-accelerates when the direction of moving body changes(with constant velocity). What acceleration literally means here?

I can understand mathematically since velocity is a vector we get acceleration whenever magnitude or direction changes. But I couldn't understand logically what acceleration means here.

Whenever an object changes speed or direction then it feels a force and therefore acceleration, because velocity is a vector quantity. Acceleration in the case you have given, where it has constant speed, means that the force is perpendicular to the velocity of the body, which means it is moving in a circle.
 
  • #3
I think u misunderstood only force causes acceleration, No force then no acceleration(Newton's first law). My doubt was: if we calculate acceleration of a body moving with a constant velocity in a circle using centripital force then wold it be equal to the acceleration calculated by direction change of velocity.
 
  • #4
PhysicsBegner said:
My doubt was: if we calculate acceleration of a body moving with a constant velocity in a circle using centripital force then wold it be equal to the acceleration calculated by direction change of velocity.
Yes, of course. Those are just two ways of saying the same thing. (I assume you mean a body moving in a circle with constant speed, not constant velocity.)

You can calculate the acceleration of the object as kinematic exercise, getting ac = v^2/r. Applying Newton's 2nd law gives you Fc = mac. It's the same acceleration either way.
 
  • #5
PhysicsBegner said:
I think u misunderstood only force causes acceleration, No force then no acceleration(Newton's first law). My doubt was: if we calculate acceleration of a body moving with a constant velocity in a circle
As Doc Al implies, this is impossible. To move with a constant velocity means to move at a constant speed in a straight line. "Velocity" is a vector quantity having both magnitude and direction. Change in either magnitude (speed) or direction is an acceleration.

using centripital force then wold it be equal to the acceleration calculated by direction change of velocity.
You are confusing "velocity" and "speed".
 
  • #6
Yes, I meant constant speed not velocity. I was confused since some textbooks use term velocity instead of speed at certain places. And I understand that a body can't travel in circular path with constant velocity.

Thank you.
 

FAQ: Fundamental doubt on Acceleration.

What is "Fundamental doubt on Acceleration?"

Fundamental doubt on Acceleration is a concept in physics that questions the understanding of how acceleration works at a fundamental level. It arises from the idea that acceleration is an inherent property of matter, rather than being caused by external forces.

How does Fundamental doubt on Acceleration challenge traditional theories of acceleration?

Fundamental doubt on Acceleration challenges traditional theories by proposing that acceleration is an inherent property of matter, rather than being caused by external forces. This idea goes against the widely accepted Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states that an object's acceleration is directly proportional to the net force acting on it.

What evidence supports the concept of Fundamental doubt on Acceleration?

There is currently no conclusive evidence that supports the concept of Fundamental doubt on Acceleration. However, some scientists point to phenomena such as inertia, where objects tend to resist changes in motion, as potential evidence for the idea that acceleration is an inherent property of matter.

How does the concept of Fundamental doubt on Acceleration impact our understanding of the universe?

If proven to be true, the concept of Fundamental doubt on Acceleration would greatly impact our understanding of the universe. It would require a complete rethinking of the fundamental laws of physics and could potentially lead to new discoveries and advancements in our understanding of the universe.

What are the implications of accepting the concept of Fundamental doubt on Acceleration?

Accepting the concept of Fundamental doubt on Acceleration would mean that our current understanding of acceleration and the forces that govern it may not be entirely accurate. This could lead to revisions in our scientific theories and a deeper understanding of the fundamental workings of the universe.

Back
Top