General Linear Group GL(n) on Vector Spaces and canonical pairing invariance

In summary, the paper discusses the General Linear Group GL(n) as it acts on vector spaces, focusing on the properties and invariance of canonical pairings. It explores how GL(n) transformations preserve the structure of vector spaces and the implications for pairing invariance, providing a mathematical framework to understand these relationships in linear algebra and representation theory. The study highlights key results and theorems that demonstrate the significance of GL(n) in maintaining the integrity of vector space operations and interactions.
  • #1
jv07cs
44
2
Does anyone have a reference that explains how the general linear group GL(n) acts on vector spaces and dual spaces? Furthermore, I would like to understand why the canonical pairing ##\langle\cdot, \cdot\rangle: V \times V^* \to \mathbb{F}##, ##(v,\alpha) \mapsto \langle\alpha,v \rangle := \alpha(v)##, is GL(n) invariant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In my opinion,

GL(n) acts, not on V, but on k^n, so it acts on the n dimensional space V only after choosing an ordered basis for V, (and thus also an ordered dual basis for V*).

Then if a is a covector in V*, represented by a row vector, and v is a vector in V, represented by a column vector, and if M is an invertible nxn matrix, then M takes a to aM and takes v to Mv, hence the fact that the matrix product aMv is associative, i.e. (aM)v = a(Mv), expresses the GL(n) - invariance of the pairing taking <v,a> in VxV*, to the dot product (a.v).

The group that acts on V, is called GL(V), and is by definition the group of linear automorphisms of V, hence it acts on V by definition, exactly as above, i.e. M in GL(V) takes v to M(v), and takes a to the composition aoM. Hence as above, (aoM)(v) = a(M(v)), shows the invariance, which here is actually a definition.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Back
Top