General Relativity-surface gravity in killing horizon

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation \kappa^2=-1/2(\bigtriangledown_{\mu}V_{\nu})(\bigtriangledown^{\mu}V^{\nu}) using given conditions related to covariant derivatives. Participants express difficulty in starting the proof, particularly with handling raised covariant derivatives. A suggested approach involves using the properties of the vector field \chi and simplifying terms through contraction. After following the initial steps, one participant successfully contracts the terms to arrive at the required result. The conversation highlights the challenges in manipulating covariant derivatives within the context of general relativity.
nikhilb1997
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
Prove the following-

\kappa^2=-1/2(\bigtriangledown_{\mu}V_{\nu})(\bigtriangledown^{\mu}V^{\nu})
Given, the following,
\chi^{\lambda}\bigtriangledown_{\lambda}\chi^{\nu}=-\kappa\chi^{\nu}
\bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0
\chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=0

Homework Equations



\kappa^2=-1/2(\bigtriangledown_{\mu}V_{\nu})(\bigtriangledown^{\mu}V^{\nu})
\chi^{\lambda}\bigtriangledown_{\lambda}\chi^{\nu}=-\kappa\chi^{\nu}
\bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0
\chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=03. The Attempt at a Solution
I do not know how to start as the equation to prove has a raised covariant derivative. I tried to use the metric to lower it but I got stuck at how the metric would affect the equation. So please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nikhilb1997 said:
1. Homework Statement
Prove the following-

\kappa^2=-1/2(\bigtriangledown_{\mu}V_{\nu})(\bigtriangledown^{\mu}V^{\nu})
Given, the following,
\chi^{\lambda}\bigtriangledown_{\lambda}\chi^{\nu}=-\kappa\chi^{\nu}
\bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0
\chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=0



Homework Equations



\kappa^2=-1/2(\bigtriangledown_{\mu}V_{\nu})(\bigtriangledown^{\mu}V^{\nu})
\chi^{\lambda}\bigtriangledown_{\lambda}\chi^{\nu}=-\kappa\chi^{\nu}
\bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0
\chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=0


3. The Attempt at a Solution
I do not know how to start as the equation to prove has a raised covariant derivative. I tried to use the metric to lower it but I got stuck at how the metric would affect the equation. So please help.

Take \chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=0, use \bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0 to get rid of half of the terms, then contract with \nabla^{\mu} \chi^{\nu}
 
clamtrox said:
Take \chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=0, use \bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0 to get rid of half of the terms, then contract with \nabla^{\mu} \chi^{\nu}
Thanks a lot. I did the first two steps but I didn't know what to do next. Contracting gave the required result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
608
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K