Geodesic in Weak Field Limit: Introducing Einstein's Relativity

In summary: Yes, that is correct. The term ##d^2x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)## because it is multiplied by ##\varepsilon/c^2## when the equation is divided by ##\varepsilon##. This leads to the final equation having a factor of ##1+O(\varepsilon)## instead of ##1+O(\varepsilon^2)##.
  • #1
GR191511
76
6
I'm reading《Introducing Einstein's Relativity_ A Deeper Understanding Ed 2》on page 180,it says:

since we are interested in the Newtonian limit,we restrict our attention to the spatial part of the geodesic equation,i.e.when a=##\alpha####\quad ##,and we obtain,by using ##\frac{d\tau}{dt}=1+O(\varepsilon^2)##:
##\frac {\partial^2 x^\alpha} {\partial t^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0##.##\quad ##I wonder how the auther gets "(1+O(##\varepsilon##))"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The authors (D'Inverno & Vickers) explained that on p179, just before eq(10.43). Do you not understand how eq(10.43) was obtained? Their preceding (unnumbered) equation is $$c^2 d\tau^2 ~=~ c^2 dt^2 (1 - \varepsilon^2) ~.$$ Take the square root of both sides. You might have to expand ##\sqrt{1 - \varepsilon^2}## as a Taylor series in ##\varepsilon## to see why it ends up as ##\,1 - O(\varepsilon^2)##.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK, topsquark and vanhees71
  • #3
strangerep said:
You might have to expand ##\sqrt{1 - \varepsilon^2}## as a Taylor series in ##\varepsilon## to see why it ends up as ##\,1 - O(\varepsilon^2)##.
Thanks!But it doesn't end up as"##1+O(\varepsilon^2)##",it is"##1+O(\varepsilon)##"
 
  • #4
GR191511 said:
it doesn't end up as"##1+O(\varepsilon^2)##",it is"##1+O(\varepsilon)##"
Check your work. Doing a Taylor series expansion of ##\sqrt{1 + \varepsilon^2}## does not mean you take the square root of ##\varepsilon^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and Vanadium 50
  • #5
PeterDonis said:
Check your work. Doing a Taylor series expansion of ##\sqrt{1 + \varepsilon^2}## does not mean you take the square root of ##\varepsilon^2##.
I mean the geodesic "##\frac {\partial^2 x^\alpha} {\partial t^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0## "it ends up as ##(1+O(\varepsilon))##
 
  • #6
GR191511 said:
I mean the geodesic "##\frac {\partial^2 x^\alpha} {\partial t^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0## "it ends up as ##(1+O(\varepsilon))##
You make it much harder to help you if you don't show your work. I'm guessing you haven't correctly followed the author's instructions after eq(10.46).
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and vanhees71
  • #7
strangerep said:
You make it much harder to help you if you don't show your work. I'm guessing you haven't correctly followed the author's instructions after eq(10.46).
##\frac {d^2 x^\alpha} {d \tau^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{d\tau}\frac{dx^c}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d}{d\tau}(\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau})+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow##
##\left[\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau})\right]\frac{dt}{d\tau}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau})+####\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}\frac{dt}{d\tau}+\frac{dx^\alpha}{dt}\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dt}{d\tau})####+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0####\Rightarrow\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}\frac{dt}{d\tau}+0+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}\frac{dt}{d\tau}=0\Rightarrow\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}####=0####\Rightarrow\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\frac{1}{c^2}\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}=0####\quad##So where is the ##1+O(\varepsilon)##?
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
  • #8
OK, it's actually a lot simpler than what you've written in post #7.

From (10.43) we have ##d\tau = dt + O(\varepsilon^2)##. That means you can replace all the ##d\tau##'s in the derivatives by ##dt##. (Think of those derivatives as ratios of differentials.)

The trick they don't seem to explain is that ##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##, as is ##\Gamma^a_{~bc}##, which is shown in (10.45) as an ##\varepsilon## term plus ##O(\varepsilon^2)##. In the geodesic equation after (10.46), they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##.

(Is that explanation sufficient? I'll agree they probably could have been clearer.)
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Dale and vanhees71
  • #9
strangerep said:
OK, it's actually a lot simpler than what you've written in post #7.

From (10.43) we have ##d\tau = dt + O(\varepsilon^2)##. That means you can replace all the ##d\tau##'s in the derivatives by ##dt##. (Think of those derivatives as ratios of differentials.)

The trick they don't seem to explain is that ##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##, as is ##\Gamma^a_{~bc}##, which is shown in (10.45) as an ##\varepsilon## term plus ##O(\varepsilon^2)##. In the geodesic equation after (10.46), they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##

(Is that explanation sufficient? I'll agree they probably could have been clearer.)
Why is "##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##"related with this question?
Do you mean it is ##\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0##before" they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##"?Thank you!
 
  • #10
GR191511 said:
Why is "##d^2 x^\alpha/dt^2## is ##O(\varepsilon)##"related with this question?
Do you mean it is ##\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\frac{d^2x^\alpha}{dt^2}+\frac{\varepsilon}{c^2}\Gamma^\alpha{}_{bc}\frac{dx^b}{dt}\frac{dx^c}{dt}(1+O(\varepsilon))=0##before" they divided throughout by 1 factor of ##\varepsilon##"?Thank you!
That's the general idea. But... (sigh)... now you've got me wanting to rewrite that stuff properly without skipping steps. Probably not today though.
 
  • Like
Likes GR191511

FAQ: Geodesic in Weak Field Limit: Introducing Einstein's Relativity

What is the geodesic in the weak field limit?

The geodesic in the weak field limit is a curved trajectory that follows the shortest distance between two points in spacetime. It is a fundamental concept in Einstein's theory of general relativity, which describes how gravity affects the curvature of spacetime.

How does the weak field limit differ from the strong field limit?

The weak field limit refers to situations where the gravitational effects are relatively small, such as in our everyday lives. In contrast, the strong field limit refers to situations where the gravitational effects are significant, such as near massive objects like black holes.

How does Einstein's theory of relativity explain the geodesic in the weak field limit?

Einstein's theory of general relativity explains the geodesic in the weak field limit by describing how matter and energy affect the curvature of spacetime. In the weak field limit, this curvature is relatively small, and the geodesic is essentially a straight line. However, in the strong field limit, the curvature is significant, and the geodesic can be highly curved.

What are some real-world applications of understanding the geodesic in the weak field limit?

Understanding the geodesic in the weak field limit is crucial for many real-world applications, such as GPS systems, which rely on precise measurements of time and space to function correctly. It also helps us understand the behavior of objects in our solar system, such as the orbits of planets around the sun.

Can the geodesic in the weak field limit be observed or measured?

Yes, the geodesic in the weak field limit can be observed and measured through various experiments and observations. For example, the bending of starlight near massive objects, such as the sun, is a direct observation of the geodesic in the weak field limit. Additionally, scientists can use precise measurements of the orbits of planets and other celestial bodies to confirm the predictions of general relativity.

Back
Top