Geometry Challenge: Prove $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$ in Convex Quadrilateral $ADBE$

In summary, the conversation discusses a convex quadrilateral $ADBE$ and a point $C$ within $\triangle ABE$ such that the sum of two angles in $\triangle ABE$ is equal to the sum of two angles in $\triangle EBD$. The goal is to prove that two specific angles, $\angle ADE$ and $\angle BDC$, are equal. The conversation also mentions the use of TiKZ drawings and seeking help from others for more complex diagrams.
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
In convex quadrilateral $ADBE$, there is a point $C$ within $\triangle ABE$ such that $\angle EAD+\angle CAB=\angle EBD+\angle CBA=180^{\circ}$.

Prove that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
[TIKZ]
\begin{scope}
\draw (0,0) circle(3);
\end{scope}
\coordinate[label=left: E] (E) at (-3,0);
\coordinate[label=below: D] (D) at (1.2,-2.75);
\coordinate[label=below: A] (A) at (-1,.-2.828);
\coordinate[label=right: F] (F) at (2.9,-0.768);
\coordinate[label=above: B] (B) at (-1,-0.26);
\coordinate[label=above: C] (C) at (-2,-1.1);
\draw (A) -- (E);
\draw (A) -- (D);
\draw (F) -- (D);
\draw (E) -- (F);
\draw (A) -- (B);
\draw (A) -- (F);
\draw (E) -- (D);
\draw (B) -- (D);
\draw [dashed] (C) -- (D);
\draw [dashed] (C) -- (B);
\draw [dashed] (C) -- (A);
[/TIKZ]

Let F be the second intersection of the circumcircle of $\triangle EAD$ and line $EB$. Then $\angle DBF=180^{\circ}-\angle EBD=\angle CBA$. Moreover,

$\begin{align*}\angle BDF&=180^{\circ}-\angle AEB-\angle ADB\\&=180^{\circ}-(360^{\circ}-\angle EAD-\angle EBD)\\&= 180^{\circ}-(\angle CAB+\angle CBA)\\&=\angle BCA\end{align*}$

These two relations give $\angle BDF \simeq \triangle BCA$.

So $\dfrac{BD}{BF}=\dfrac{BC}{BA}$ Together with $\angle DBF=\angle CBA$, we have $\triangle BDC \simeq \triangle BFA$.

This results in $\angle ADE=\angle AFE=\angle BFA=\angle BDC$. (Q.E.D.)
 
  • #3
You always do such a nice job with your presentations...the TiKZ drawings are really nice (and add such quality), and I know they take some effort too. :)
 
  • #4
Mark, to be completely honest, I have to say once you get to know some simple commands like how to draw a circle, joining lines, labeling angles, coloring some region, etc, then basically you can draw anything out of these simple commands. Of course, my other trick is always look for Klaas for help when I got stuck in some effect I want to produce to my diagram, hehehe... (Happy)
 

FAQ: Geometry Challenge: Prove $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$ in Convex Quadrilateral $ADBE$

How do you prove that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$ in a convex quadrilateral $ADBE$?

To prove that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$ in a convex quadrilateral $ADBE$, we can use the Angle Sum Property of Quadrilaterals. This property states that the sum of all angles in a quadrilateral is equal to $360^\circ$. Since $ADBE$ is a convex quadrilateral, the sum of its angles is $360^\circ$. Therefore, we can set up the following equation: $\angle A + \angle D + \angle B + \angle E = 360^\circ$. We can then use the given information that $\angle A = \angle B$ and $\angle D = \angle E$ to substitute into the equation. This results in the equation $\angle A + \angle D + \angle A + \angle D = 360^\circ$, which simplifies to $2(\angle A + \angle D) = 360^\circ$. From here, we can solve for $\angle A + \angle D$ and show that it is equal to $180^\circ$, proving that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$.

Can you use any other properties to prove that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$ in a convex quadrilateral $ADBE$?

Yes, there are other properties that can be used to prove that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$ in a convex quadrilateral $ADBE$. One possible approach is to use the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem, which states that if two parallel lines are cut by a transversal, then the alternate interior angles are congruent. In this case, we can draw a line through point $D$ parallel to $AB$ and use the theorem to show that $\angle ADE$ and $\angle BDC$ are congruent.

What is the difference between a convex and a concave quadrilateral?

A convex quadrilateral is a four-sided polygon where all interior angles are less than $180^\circ$. This means that all of the vertices of the quadrilateral point outwards, away from the center. On the other hand, a concave quadrilateral has at least one interior angle that is greater than $180^\circ$. This means that at least one of the vertices points inwards, towards the center of the quadrilateral.

Can you prove that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$ if $ADBE$ is not a convex quadrilateral?

No, we cannot prove that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$ if $ADBE$ is not a convex quadrilateral. The given statement only holds true for convex quadrilaterals. In a concave quadrilateral, the angles may not follow the same rules and properties as a convex quadrilateral, making it impossible to prove that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$.

Why is it important to prove that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$ in a convex quadrilateral $ADBE$?

Proving that $\angle ADE=\angle BDC$ in a convex quadrilateral $ADBE$ is important because it helps us understand and analyze the relationships between the angles in a quadrilateral. It also allows us to make accurate measurements and calculations in various geometric problems and real-life situations. Additionally, proving this statement helps us develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which are essential in the field of mathematics and science.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top