- #1
- 10,123
- 137
Or, at least, that he didn't possesses good intelligence prior to the Iraqi war:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/14/bush.iraq/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/14/bush.iraq/index.html
He never did, and still doesn't.he didn't possesses good intelligence
A partial admission of it is better than none, though..Astronuc said:He never did, and still doesn't.
A partial admission of it is better than none, though..
What would be interesting is to see the video that the FBI confiscated.doctor knowit said:ever see this video clip?
[crackpot link deleted]
Interesting...that's all i can say...well i guess i "could" say more
George Bush has made various comments about his intelligence over the years. In a 2003 interview with Newsweek, he stated, "I'm not the most articulate person you'll ever meet. I have my flaws, too." In a 2010 interview with Matt Lauer, he joked, "I think I was unprepared for war. In other words, I didn't campaign and say, 'Please vote for me, I'll be able to handle an attack.' In other words, I didn't anticipate war." However, he has never explicitly admitted to being "dumb."
There is no objective evidence to support the claim that George Bush is dumb. While he may not have been the most eloquent speaker or made some controversial decisions during his presidency, there is no indication that he lacked intelligence or was unable to understand complex issues.
There are a variety of reasons why some people may perceive George Bush as being "dumb." Some may point to his verbal gaffes and public speaking mistakes, while others may disagree with his policies and view them as unwise. However, these factors do not necessarily reflect on his intelligence.
As mentioned before, George Bush has made self-deprecating comments about his intelligence, but he has never explicitly admitted to being "dumb." In fact, in a 2006 interview with NBC's Brian Williams, he stated, "I know how to lead. I've been leading. I know how to set goals and achieve them." This suggests that he does not view himself as being unintelligent.
As scientists, we cannot make assumptions about an individual's intelligence without objective evidence. It is not our place to label someone as "dumb" or "smart" based on personal opinions or public perception. We should focus on analyzing and evaluating evidence and facts, rather than making judgments about an individual's intelligence based on their political beliefs or public image.