Get A Reference for f(R) Gravity

In summary: For this reason, one usually stays with a linear form.What is f(R) gravity?It is a theory with a modified Hilbert-Einstein action, where the density is not proportiomal to the Ricci scalar R, but to some nonlinear function of it. The modified field equations will contain the Ricci curvature in a non-linear way, and might disallow the possibility of a black hole.
  • #1
thecoop
15
0
hey guys , is there anybody here to give me a nice reference for f(R) gavity ?


Regards


thecoop
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
thecoop said:
hey guys , is there anybody here to give me a nice reference for f(R) gavity ?
What is f(R) gravity?
 
  • #3
There's a Wikipedia page about it, for what it's worth. It has references to what appear to be legitimate publications.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F(R)_gravity

It appears to be a serious research area, although probably a bit out of the mainstream. I'd never heard of it, either.
 
  • #4
Boston_Guy said:
What is f(R) gravity?

It would be a theory with a modified Hilbert-Einstein action, where the density is not proportiomal to the Ricci scalar R, but to some non-linear function of it.

The modified field equations will contain the Ricci curvature in a non-linear way, and might disallow the possibility of a black hole.

By dimensional analysis, one can construct a dimensionless quantity from c, [itex]\hbar[/itex], G, and R:
[tex]
\frac{G \, R}{\hbar \, c^{3}}
[/tex]
Also, we can construct a combination with the dimension of an action density:
[tex]
\left[ \frac{S}{x^4} \right] = \mathrm{T}^{-1} \, \mathrm{L}^{-2} \, \mathrm{M} \stackrel{\mathrm{n.u.}}{\rightarrow} \mathrm{L}^{-4}
[/tex]
Because [itex]\left[ G \right] = \mathrm{T}^{-2} \, \mathrm{L}^{3} \, \mathrm{M}^{-1} \stackrel{\mathrm{n.u.}}{\rightarrow} \mathrm{L}^{2}[/itex], we ought to have [itex]\mathcal{L} \propto G^{-2}[/itex]. Returning the proper powers of [itex]\hbar[/itex], and c, we get:
[tex]
\mathcal{L} \propto \frac{c^6}{\hbar \, G^2}
[/tex]
Thus, we can write:
[tex]
S_{g} = \frac{c^6}{\hbar G^2} \, \int{f\left( \frac{\hbar \, G \, R}{c^3} \right) \, \sqrt{-g} \, d^4 x}
[/tex]

If you require the Planck's constant to drop out of the expression, you ought to have:
[tex]
f(x) = A \, x
[/tex]
i.e. the Lagrangian density is proportional to the scalar curvature. This is the ordinary Hilbert-Einstein action. The numerical constant A is fixed by Newton's Law of universal Gravitation.

We might be tempted to choose a different functional form. For example, let us see if we can get G, the Universal Gravitational constant, to drop out from the expression. In a sense, this would make the action purely quantum effect. It is easy to see that this happens if:
[tex]
f_{2} = B \, x^2
[/tex]
A quadratic function dominates a linear function for large values of the argument, i.e. for:
[tex]
R \gg \frac{A}{B} \, L^{-2}_{P}
[/tex]
where [itex]L_{P} = \sqrt{G \, \hbar/c^{3}} \sim 10^{-35} \, \mathrm{m}[/itex] is the Planck length.

There is, however, a problem with choosing a non-linear function. Namely, [itex]R[/itex] contains second derivatives of the metric tensor, but as a 4-gradient. Therefore, they get integrated out when the function is linear. But, one cannot do the same for a nonlinear function, and the equations that we would get would contain derivatives higher than two of the metric tensor.
 

FAQ: Get A Reference for f(R) Gravity

What is f(R) Gravity?

f(R) Gravity is a modification of Einstein's theory of General Relativity, in which the gravitational field is described by a function of the Ricci scalar, R. This means that the strength of gravity can vary depending on the curvature of space-time.

How is f(R) Gravity different from General Relativity?

In General Relativity, the gravitational field is described by the Einstein field equations, which involve the Ricci tensor. In f(R) Gravity, the Ricci scalar is used instead, giving more flexibility in describing the gravitational field.

What are the main applications of f(R) Gravity?

f(R) Gravity has been proposed as a possible explanation for the accelerated expansion of the universe. It has also been studied as a potential alternative to dark matter and dark energy.

What are the challenges in testing f(R) Gravity?

One of the main challenges in testing f(R) Gravity is that it can be difficult to distinguish from General Relativity in certain situations. Additionally, the mathematical complexity of the theory makes it challenging to create accurate and precise predictions.

What is the current state of research on f(R) Gravity?

f(R) Gravity is an active area of research, with ongoing studies and experiments being conducted to test its validity. While some evidence supports the theory, it is still considered a controversial alternative to General Relativity and further research is needed to fully understand its implications.

Similar threads

Back
Top