Getting geodesic from variational principle

In summary: Then the Euler-Lagrange equation is$$L=\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{d}{d\theta} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot \theta}\right) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot \theta} \right]$$
  • #1
LCSphysicist
646
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
The metric is $$ds^2 = \frac{dr^2 + r^2 d\theta ^2}{r^2-a^2} - \frac{r^2 dr^2}{(r^2-a^2)^2}$$

I need to prove the geodesic is: $$a^2 (\frac{dr}{d \theta})^2 + a^2 r^2 = K r^4$$

My method was to variate the action ##\int\frac{(\frac{dr}{d\theta})^2 + r^2 }{r^2-a^2} - \frac{r^2 (\frac{dr}{d\theta})^2}{(r^2-a^2)^2} d \theta##

But the equation i am getting is $$a^2 (\frac{dr}{d \theta})^2 + r^2 = K (r^2-a^2)^2$$
Which can not be reduced to the answer.

I am a little confused, i could simpy calculate the Christoffel symbol, but i think this variation method easier, yet i am not sure how to use it.

So basically, my guess on why i have got the wrong answer is that the "lagrangean" i am variating is wrong. So what lagrangean indeed give us the right answer? Only ##g_{ab} \frac{dx^a}{ds} \frac{dx^b}{ds}= 1 ## and ##\sqrt{g_{ab} \frac{dx^a}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^b}{d\lambda}}##? Or the lagrangean i used above is right, and i have done some algebric error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your approach failed because in general the Euler-Lagrange equations produced from [itex]L_1(r, dr/d\theta)[/itex] are not the same as those obtained from [itex]L_2(r, dr/d\theta) = \sqrt{L_1}[/itex]: [tex]
\begin{split}
\frac{d}{d\theta} \left( \frac{\partial L_2}{\partial r'}\right) - \frac{\partial L_2}{\partial r}
&= \frac{d}{d\theta} \left( \frac{1}{2L_2} \frac{\partial L_1}{\partial r'} \right) - \frac{1}{2L_2}\frac{\partial L_1}{\partial r} \\
&= \frac{1}{2L_2} \left[\frac{d}{d\theta} \left( \frac{\partial L_1}{\partial r'}\right) - \frac{\partial L_1}{\partial r}\right] + \frac{\partial L_1}{\partial r'} \frac{d}{d\theta}\left( \frac{1}{2L_2} \right) \\
&\neq \frac{1}{2L_2} \left[\frac{d}{d\theta} \left( \frac{\partial L_1}{\partial r'}\right) - \frac{\partial L_1}{\partial r}\right]
\end{split}
[/tex] If you take [itex]s[/itex] as the independent variable then you can work with [itex]f(r) r'^2 + g(r) \theta'^2[/itex] directly because by definition its total derivative with respect to [itex]s[/itex] is zero and you end up with the same Euler-Lagrange equation as you obtain from [itex]\sqrt{f(r) r'^2 + g(r) \theta'^2}[/itex].
 
  • #3
You have a Lagrangian system
$$L=\dot r^2\Big(\frac{1}{r^2-a^2}-\frac{r^2}{(r^2-a^2)^2}\Big)+\frac{r^2}{r^2-a^2}\dot\theta^2.$$
You must consider this system at the energy level ##L=1##
perhaps the following cyclic integral will be of use
$$\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot \theta}=const$$
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Back
Top