MHB Ggnore's question at Yahoo Answers (IVP, Laplace transform)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses an initial value problem defined by the differential equation y'' + 8y' + 16y = 0 with initial conditions y(0) = 1 and y'(0) = 5. The Laplace transform of the solution is derived, resulting in Y(s) = (s + 13) / (s + 4)². The inverse Laplace transform yields the solution function y(t) = e^(-4t) + 9te^(-4t). The response provides a clear method for applying the Laplace transform to solve the given IVP. This approach effectively demonstrates the use of linearity and known transforms in solving differential equations.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Consider
y''+8y'+16y=0, y(0)=1, y'(0)=5

find the laplace transform to the solution, that is Y(s)=L(y(t))
Y(s)=_______

Find the function y solution of the IVP abov,
y(t)=__________________

Here is a link to the question:

Consider the initial value problem for y; Laplace? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello ggnore,

Using the linearity of $\mathcal{L}$:

$$\mathcal{L}\left\{y''(t)\right\}+8\mathcal{L} \left\{y'(t)\right\}+16\mathcal{L}\left\{y(t) \right\}=0$$ Using $\mathcal{L} \left\{y''(t) \right\}=s^2\mathcal{L} \left\{y(t) \right\}-sy(0)-y'(0)$ and $\mathcal{L}\left\{y'(t)\right\}=s\mathcal{L}\left\{y(t)\right\}-y(0)$ we easily verify: $$\mathcal{L}\left\{y(t)\right\}=\dfrac{s+13}{(s+4)^2}=\ldots=\dfrac{1}{s+4}+\dfrac{9}{(s+4)^2}=Y(s)$$ Using $\mathcal{L}\left\{t^ne^{at}\right\}=\dfrac{n!}{(s-a)^{n+1}}\quad(n=0,1,2,\ldots)$ we get: $$y(t)=\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left\{Y(s)\right\}=e^{-4t}+9te^{-4t}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top