- #1
Daniiel
- 123
- 0
Hey,
I've been going through a few past papers for an upcoming exam on complex analysis, I found this T/F question with a few parts I'm not confident on, I'll explain the whole lot of my work and show.[PLAIN]http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/2069/asdasdsu.jpg
a) |2+3i|=|2-3i| so false
b) True since when the coefficients are real the roots come in complex conjugate pairs
c) Using triangle inequality, 1/|z^2+1|=> 1/|z^2| +2 = 1/ (x^2+y^2+2)
1/ (x^2+y^2+2)<=1/x^2+2<=1/2 I am not sure if these inequality opperations are 100%
d)False, cannot be every f since f must be analytic within the domain and curve region
e) False, i think, by Cauchys integral formula C must be a simple closed curve enclosing Zo, so as C in this question is just a line, False
f) I think this is true, but I'm not sure if you can use cauchys theorem backwards. So true as int f(z)dz=0 if f is analytic in C. So since int f(z)dz=0, f must be analytic inside and on C.
Is the converse of the cauchy theorem true?
h) I'm not sure how to approach this, but I was thinking you could just let an be somthing like 1/sqrt(3)^n for the h), then it would work, true
g) i can't see a way to do somthing similar, so i think the answer is false, since if you make an "an" such that converges for 2-i, then it will also converge for 1+i,
I've been going through a few past papers for an upcoming exam on complex analysis, I found this T/F question with a few parts I'm not confident on, I'll explain the whole lot of my work and show.[PLAIN]http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/2069/asdasdsu.jpg
a) |2+3i|=|2-3i| so false
b) True since when the coefficients are real the roots come in complex conjugate pairs
c) Using triangle inequality, 1/|z^2+1|=> 1/|z^2| +2 = 1/ (x^2+y^2+2)
1/ (x^2+y^2+2)<=1/x^2+2<=1/2 I am not sure if these inequality opperations are 100%
d)False, cannot be every f since f must be analytic within the domain and curve region
e) False, i think, by Cauchys integral formula C must be a simple closed curve enclosing Zo, so as C in this question is just a line, False
f) I think this is true, but I'm not sure if you can use cauchys theorem backwards. So true as int f(z)dz=0 if f is analytic in C. So since int f(z)dz=0, f must be analytic inside and on C.
Is the converse of the cauchy theorem true?
h) I'm not sure how to approach this, but I was thinking you could just let an be somthing like 1/sqrt(3)^n for the h), then it would work, true
g) i can't see a way to do somthing similar, so i think the answer is false, since if you make an "an" such that converges for 2-i, then it will also converge for 1+i,
Last edited by a moderator: