Google, IBM, Rigetti, and IQM all manufacture superconducting quantum computers -- What are the differences?

[brianeyes88677]

1. Google, IBM, Rigetti, and IQM all manufacture superconducting quantum computers. What are the main reasons for the differences in the accuracy of their chips?
2. IBM has recently released its latest chip, please analyze and see what is the advancement in the technology: https://www.iotworldtoday.com/quantum/ibm-launches-its-most-powerful-quantum-computer

 

[pines-demon]

please analyze and see what is the advancement in the technology

Oh boy, this is PF just a please is not going to cut it out here, please show some effort and provide more details of what you have found.

 

[FactChecker]

To me, "manufacture" implies some sort of mass production or production for the end user. That could not be further from the truth. All current quantum computers are very experimental, one-off, devices. They are all experimenting with small devices to see how to proceed toward a practical device. They all differ in significant ways. Although they are small, they are as large as the current technology allows. The users are also experimenting with how to use them.

 

[berkeman]

Thread closed temporarily for Moderation.

 

[berkeman]

Thread has been moved to the schoolwork forums and is reopened provisionally.

@brianeyes88677 -- You need to show some effort in order to get help with schoolwork-type questions at PF.