Graphing electric potential for two positive charges

In summary, the conversation revolved around a graphing problem where the speaker had to plot the electric potential as units of ## \frac{k_eQ}{a} ## in comparison to a textbook plot. The speaker initially drew the graph freehand, but was advised to use a plotting program for accuracy. After some back and forth, the speaker shared a new graph that was corrected in terms of the x-axis, but still had incorrect labels on the y-axis. The speaker also had some confusion about the notation used for the x-axis and asked for clarification.
  • #1
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For part (a) of this problem,
1674594378095.png

The solution is
1674594413966.png

However, my solution is
1674594447007.png

Am I correct? In the solutions that don't appear to plot the electric potential as units of ## \frac {k_eQ} {a} ## like I have which the problem statement said to do.

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your plot is too crudely drawn for a direct comparison with the textbook. Not only that, but in your plot the tick marks on the vertical axis are not equally spaced as is the case in the textbook plot. So what exactly are you comparing? I suggest that you use a plotting program instead of doing it freehand. Free plotting programs exist on the internet. I went to https://www.desmos.com/calculator and created this.

Screen Shot 2023-01-24 at 3.21.43 PM.png
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and member 731016
  • #3
kuruman said:
Your plot is too crudely drawn for a direct comparison with the textbook. Not only that, but in your plot the tick marks on the vertical axis are not equally spaced as is the case in the textbook plot. So what exactly are you comparing? I suggest that you use a plotting program instead of doing it freehand. Free plotting programs exist on the internet. I went to https://www.desmos.com/calculator and created this.

View attachment 321043
Yes sorry @kuruman I will graph it. I am comparing my graph which has a y-axis of ## V(\frac{k_eQ}{a}) = \frac {2}{\sqrt{10}}, \frac {2}{\sqrt{5}}, \frac {2}{\sqrt{2}}, 2## and x-axis of## x(a) = -3a, -2a, -a, a, 2a, 3a ##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
kuruman said:
Your plot is too crudely drawn for a direct comparison with the textbook. Not only that, but in your plot the tick marks on the vertical axis are not equally spaced as is the case in the textbook plot. So what exactly are you comparing? I suggest that you use a plotting program instead of doing it freehand. Free plotting programs exist on the internet. I went to https://www.desmos.com/calculator and created this.

View attachment 321043
Here is my new graph @kuruman
1674598770227.png

I am comparing the y and x axes. I am not sure whether my graph is correct or not.

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 1674598616983.png
    1674598616983.png
    18.9 KB · Views: 84
  • #5
It is not correct. The x-axis is fine and compares directly with the textbook and my plot if ##a=1##, i.e. plot ##k_eQ/ a## vs. ##x/a##. The y-axis is not OK. You cannot label equally spaced intervals using unequal labels. Since there are four intervals between zero and 2 on the vertical axis, the labels should be 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5. In fact the demos plotting utility assumes that this is the case.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #6
kuruman said:
It is not correct. The x-axis is fine and compares directly with the textbook and my plot if ##a=1##, i.e. plot ##k_eQ/ a## vs. ##x/a##. The y-axis is not OK. You cannot label equally spaced intervals using unequal labels. Since there are four intervals between zero and 2 on the vertical axis, the labels should be 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5. In fact the demos plotting utility assumes that this is the case.
Thank you for your reply @kuruman ! Whoops I see my mistake with the y-axis. Also, I've never seen the notation ##x/a## - what does it mean please?

I will post a new graph soon.
 
  • #7
kuruman said:
It is not correct. The x-axis is fine and compares directly with the textbook and my plot if ##a=1##, i.e. plot ##k_eQ/ a## vs. ##x/a##. The y-axis is not OK. You cannot label equally spaced intervals using unequal labels. Since there are four intervals between zero and 2 on the vertical axis, the labels should be 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5. In fact the demos plotting utility assumes that this is the case.
Here's the new graph @kuruman ,
1674600472875.png
 
  • #8
That's fine except for the old labels on the vertical axis that need to be removed. Just so that you know. You don't have to do it because it's not going to be graded.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #9
kuruman said:
That's fine except for the old labels on the vertical axis that need to be removed. Just so that you know. You don't have to do it because it's not going to be graded.
Thank you @kuruman , but I still don't see how my and their graphs are equivalent. On their graph the y-axis is ## \frac {V(x)a} {k_eQ}## and my graph it is ## V (\frac {k_eQ} {a}) ##

For the x-axis, their graph is ## x/a ## and my graph is ## x ##.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the notation ## x ## is the same as ## x(a) ##. I'm not sure why.

Many thanks!
 
  • #10
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you @kuruman , but I still don't see how my and their graphs are equivalent. On their graph the y-axis is ## \frac {V(x)a} {k_eQ}## and my graph it is ## V (\frac {k_eQ} {a}) ##

For the x-axis, their graph is ## x/a ## and my graph is ## x ##.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the notation ## x ## is the same as ## x(a) ##. I'm not sure why.

Many thanks!
EDIT: Sorry I meant that the notation ## x ## is not the same as ## x(a) ##
 
  • #11
This may help https://www.desmos.com/calculator/zu8hbssbxp . (Visit to see how the pieces below are created.)

Vary the a-slider.

(By the way, you can copy-paste equations from desmos (as TeX, acceptable for MathJax)... just surround by itex and /itex in square brackets .)

[itex]V_{factor}=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\left(x_{factor}\right)^{2}+1}}[/itex] (right-click the equation)
where
[itex]V=\frac{kQ}{a}\left(\frac{2}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)^{2}+1}}\right) [/itex]

[itex] V_{fac}=\frac{V}{\left(\frac{kQ}{a}\right)}[/itex] and [itex]x_{fac}=\frac{x}{a} [/itex] (different variable names given in Desmos) are both dimensionless quantities.
([itex] \frac{kQ}{a}[/itex] carries the units of Volts, and [itex] \frac{x}{a}[/itex] carries the units of meters.)Note that if the [implied] right-hand-side of an entry has a free variable, it becomes the independent variable.

1674650831022.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes member 731016 and kuruman
  • #12
robphy said:
This may help https://www.desmos.com/calculator/zu8hbssbxp . (Visit to see how the pieces below are created.)

Vary the a-slider.

(By the way, you can copy-paste equations from desmos (as TeX, acceptable for MathJax)... just surround by itex and /itex in square brackets .)

[itex]V_{factor}=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\left(x_{factor}\right)^{2}+1}}[/itex] (right-click the equation)
where
[itex]V=\frac{kQ}{a}\left(\frac{2}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)^{2}+1}}\right) [/itex]

[itex] V_{fac}=\frac{V}{\left(\frac{kQ}{a}\right)}[/itex] and [itex]x_{fac}=\frac{x}{a} [/itex] (different variable names given in Desmos) are both dimensionless quantities.
([itex] \frac{kQ}{a}[/itex] carries the units of Volts, and [itex] \frac{x}{a}[/itex] carries the units of meters.)Note that if the [implied] right-hand-side of an entry has a free variable, it becomes the independent variable.

View attachment 321094
Thank you for your reply @robphy ! I kind of get what you are saying that my and their graphs are equivalent, is that correct?

Many thanks!
 
  • #13
Type in your equation in that Desmos file and see if it matches.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #14
robphy said:
Type in your equation in that Desmos file and see if it matches.
Thank you for your reply @robphy! How do I do that sorry?

Many thanks!
 
  • #15
On that Desmos file, add a blank entry or scroll down to find one blank entry.
Type in your formula, using variable names not already used.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #16
robphy said:
On that Desmos file, add a blank entry or scroll down to find one blank entry.
Type in your formula, using variable names not already used.
Thank you @robphy! I will give it a try and post it.
 
  • #17
robphy said:
On that Desmos file, add a blank entry or scroll down to find one blank entry.
Type in your formula, using variable names not already used.
Thanks @robphy - it seems to be working! However why dose it work?

Many thanks!
 

FAQ: Graphing electric potential for two positive charges

What is electric potential?

Electric potential, often denoted by V, is the amount of electric potential energy per unit charge at a specific point in an electric field. It is a scalar quantity and is measured in volts (V).

How do you calculate the electric potential due to a single positive charge?

The electric potential V at a distance r from a single positive charge Q is given by the formula V = kQ/r, where k is Coulomb's constant (approximately 8.99 × 10^9 N·m²/C²).

How do you find the total electric potential due to two positive charges?

To find the total electric potential at a point due to two positive charges, you sum the individual potentials from each charge at that point. If the charges are Q1 and Q2, and the distances from the point to the charges are r1 and r2 respectively, the total potential V is V = kQ1/r1 + kQ2/r2.

What is the shape of the electric potential graph for two positive charges?

The graph of electric potential for two positive charges typically shows two peaks corresponding to the locations of the charges. The potential decreases as you move away from each charge and reaches a minimum at the midpoint between the two charges, although it does not go to zero.

How does the distance between the two charges affect the electric potential graph?

The distance between the two positive charges affects the width and height of the peaks in the electric potential graph. As the distance between the charges increases, the peaks become more separated and the potential at the midpoint decreases. Conversely, if the charges are closer together, the peaks are closer and the potential at the midpoint is higher.

Back
Top