Gravitational Collapse Calculations Problem Solved

In summary, T. Padmanabhan's General Relativity discusses the gravitational collapse of a sphere of pressureless dust in section 7.6. The author's argument is similar to Landau's, but reading Landau's did not provide much help. The calculations are shown in pictures and the question is about equations 7.188, 7.189, and 7.190. The author is confused about why three different cases are considered for the function f, as it seems that choosing one region would suffice. However, the three possibilities correspond to different initial conditions and must all be taken into account.
  • #1
ShayanJ
Insights Author
Gold Member
2,810
605
I'm reading T. Padmanabhans General Relativity. In section 7.6, he describes the gravitational collapse of a sphere of pressureless dust(So ## T_{\mu \nu}=\rho u_{\mu} u_{\nu} ##). I should say his argument is the same as Landau's, but reading Landau's didn't help too.
At first, he assumes a line element of the form:
## ds^2=-d\tau^2+e^{\lambda(\tau,R)}dR^2+[r(\tau,R)]^2(d\theta ^2+\sin^2 \theta d\varphi^2)##
The rest of the calculations are shown in the following pictures.
Screenshot from 2015-04-22 22:57:18.png
Screenshot from 2015-04-22 22:58:13.png


My problem is with eq. 7.188,7.189 and 7.190. I can't understand why should we consider three cases for the function f. Because if this is only an arbitrary function we use in constructing the solution, then choosing one region would do the job and it makes no difference which region we choose. But then is it actually considering three regions for an arbitrary function? Or a physical interpretation is being attached to the function f and the three regions are somehow different parts of the collapse?
I'll appreciate any exlpanation.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Shyan said:
if this is only an arbitrary function we use in constructing the solution, then choosing one region would do the job

No, it wouldn't, because you might not be covering all possible initial conditions. The three different possibilities for ##f## correspond to three different kinds of initial conditions: if I'm remembering correctly, ##f > 0##, ##f = 0##, and ##f < 0## correspond to collapses where the inward velocity of the dust a a given radius is greater than, equal to, or less than the "escape velocity" at that radius, which is ##\sqrt{2M / r}## ( ##M## is the total mass of the dust as measured from far away, which will be constant during the collapse). All three possibilities must be considered since they are all physically possible initial conditions.
 
  • Like
Likes ShayanJ

Related to Gravitational Collapse Calculations Problem Solved

1. What is meant by gravitational collapse?

Gravitational collapse is a phenomenon in which a massive object, such as a star, collapses under its own gravity due to the exhaustion of its internal nuclear fuel. This can result in the formation of a black hole or a neutron star.

2. How are gravitational collapse calculations solved?

Gravitational collapse calculations involve solving complex equations, such as the Einstein field equations, using numerical methods and computer simulations. These calculations take into account factors such as the mass, density, and temperature of the collapsing object.

3. What are some real-life applications of gravitational collapse calculations?

Gravitational collapse calculations are used in astrophysics to understand the formation and evolution of stars, galaxies, and other celestial objects. They also have practical applications in fields such as cosmology and gravitational wave research.

4. What are the limitations of gravitational collapse calculations?

Gravitational collapse calculations are limited by our current understanding of gravity and the limitations of computer simulations. They also do not account for other factors that may affect the collapse, such as magnetic fields or the presence of dark matter.

5. How do gravitational collapse calculations contribute to our understanding of the universe?

Gravitational collapse calculations allow us to study and make predictions about the behavior of massive objects in the universe. They also help us understand the fundamental laws of gravity and how they shape the structure and evolution of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
468
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
972
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
635
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
571
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
881
Back
Top