Gravitational Coupling Constant: Answers & Derivation

In summary, there is some confusion regarding the gravitational coupling constant and its relationship to Newton's constant G. One source states that it is dimensionless and proportional to G, while another states that it is proportional to the square root of G. The definition of the coupling constant also varies, with some sources using the ratio of the electron and proton masses and others using the inverse of the proton mass. Nonrenormalizability may be seen in the first case by examining the superficial degree of divergence.
  • #1
latentcorpse
1,444
0
Perhaps I'm confusing two different things but I've read online (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_coupling_constant) that the gravitational coupling constant is dimensionless and proportional to Newton's constant G.

However, I have also read that the gravitational coupling constant is proportional to the square root of G, and since in a 4d theory, G has mass dimension -2 (can see from an Einstein Hilbert action), the coupling will have dimension -1 and this is the reason GR can't be renormalised.

My questions are:

1, Which of these are correct?

2, How do we derive the relationship between the coupling and G?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It depends on the definition. You can see that Wikipedia defines the coupling constant as [itex] \alpha_G = m_e / m_p [/itex], whereas normally you would call [itex] 1/m_p [/itex] as the coupling constant, as it's what's in front of the interaction term in the Lagrangian.
 
  • #3
clamtrox said:
It depends on the definition. You can see that Wikipedia defines the coupling constant as [itex] \alpha_G = m_e / m_p [/itex], whereas normally you would call [itex] 1/m_p [/itex] as the coupling constant, as it's what's in front of the interaction term in the Lagrangian.

Ok. Well now the 2nd definition makes sense. How can we see nonrenormalizability in the first case, where we have a dimensionless coupling? Presumably we need a different argument - looking at the superficial degree of divergence or something?
 

Related to Gravitational Coupling Constant: Answers & Derivation

1. What is the gravitational coupling constant?

The gravitational coupling constant, denoted by G, is a fundamental constant in physics that determines the strength of the gravitational force between two objects with mass. It is a measure of how strongly two objects are pulled towards each other due to their mass.

2. How is the gravitational coupling constant derived?

The gravitational coupling constant is derived from the universal law of gravitation, which states that the force between two objects with masses m1 and m2 separated by a distance r is given by F = Gm1m2/r^2. By rearranging this equation, we can solve for G and derive its value.

3. What is the value of the gravitational coupling constant?

The value of the gravitational coupling constant is approximately 6.674 x 10^-11 m^3/kg/s^2. This value is constant throughout the universe and plays a crucial role in our understanding of gravity and the behavior of celestial bodies.

4. How does the gravitational coupling constant affect the strength of gravity?

The gravitational coupling constant determines the strength of the gravitational force between two objects. A higher value of G indicates a stronger gravitational force, while a lower value indicates a weaker force. This means that the value of G directly affects the strength of gravity between objects.

5. Can the gravitational coupling constant change?

The current understanding of physics does not allow for the gravitational coupling constant to change. It is considered to be a fundamental constant of nature and is thought to be constant throughout space and time. However, there are some theories that suggest the possibility of a varying gravitational coupling constant, but more research is needed to confirm this.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
849
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
359
Replies
8
Views
907
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top