Gravitational Potential at a Midpoint: What is the Solution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating gravitational potential and field strength at a midpoint between two equal masses. It establishes that the gravitational field strength cancels to zero due to equal and opposite forces. For gravitational potential, the participant initially misinterprets the formula but later realizes that the correct answer involves summing the potentials from both masses, leading to a potential of -4GM/r. The ambiguity in defining gravitational potential at infinity is noted, emphasizing that potential can be adjusted by a constant without affecting physics. Ultimately, the potential at the midpoint cannot be zero, ruling out one of the answer choices.
pyman999
7
0

Homework Statement


9500186bdc.jpg


Homework Equations


g = G*M / r^2, where g is the gravitational field strength, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the attracting body, r is the distance from the center of mass of the body.
V = -G*M / r, where V is the gravitational potential.

The Attempt at a Solution


For the gravitational field strength, as P is at a midpoint, we can say that r is 1/2*r, and as the masses are also equal, G*M / 1/2*r^2 = G*M / 1/2*r^2 (as they are equal, and in opposite directions), and they will simply cancel to 0. Therefore, it can't be A or B.

For gravitational potential, again, the masses are equal, and r is 1/2*r, so -GM / 1/2*r = -GM / 1/2*r, they will again cancel to 0. However, the answer is apparently C, where gravitational potential is -4G*M / r? I can't see why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In V = -G*M / r there are no vectors, only scalars. r is a distance in this formula.

(dividing by a vector is awkward...)
 
BvU said:
In V = -G*M / r there are no vectors, only scalars. r is a distance in this formula.

(dividing by a vector is awkward...)
I see, so then you're left with -2GM / r + -2GM / r, my mistake.
 
The problem statement should clarify that the potential "at infinity" is defined as zero. Otherwise the question is ambiguous - you can always add a constant value to the potential without changing physics.
Using this, you can rule out answer (D) simply from the fact that an object there would need energy to escape, therefore the potential there cannot be zero.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top