- #1
CHOP
- 54
- 2
Or both?
The cycling between 'stretch' and 'squeeze' is caused by the orientation changing of the black holes with respect to us. Correct?
This is understood as waves (or pulses) moving through space, Correct? So they take time to get to us.
So, consider the orientation which yields us being stretched. Imagine that orientation replaced with a hypothetical single black hole, which stretches us about the same as that orientation did.
In this single hole case, it would be a continuous stretch, because there is no orientation changing happening.
So we are simply stretched. Now, if we consider a range of time of the whole time that we are stretched, is it right to say that what stretched us (during that range) moved through space to us?
The cycling between 'stretch' and 'squeeze' is caused by the orientation changing of the black holes with respect to us. Correct?
This is understood as waves (or pulses) moving through space, Correct? So they take time to get to us.
So, consider the orientation which yields us being stretched. Imagine that orientation replaced with a hypothetical single black hole, which stretches us about the same as that orientation did.
In this single hole case, it would be a continuous stretch, because there is no orientation changing happening.
So we are simply stretched. Now, if we consider a range of time of the whole time that we are stretched, is it right to say that what stretched us (during that range) moved through space to us?