- #1
SimonA
- 176
- 0
I'm trying to build an explanatory theory that encompasses both the standard and cosmological standard models (isn't everyone ?)
I'd appreciate some help with some questions I have;
1) Is there any reason to be sure/confident that the strong nuclear force is not directly linked with gravity in the same way the other two forces are ?
2) Why are quarks (+gluon field etc) considered to carry the mass - rather than gravitation being seen as a fundamental property of the strong nuclear force, in much the same way that electromagnetic forces are fundamentally connected to to the weak force ?
3) Considering...
-the 'multiplicity of entities' involved in theories of dark matter
-the complete lack of testable evidence for the multiverse
-the suggestive evidence of extra dimensions (quasi-crystals, the 'leak' of gravity, M-Theory maths etc)
...is there any reason not to believe that we view things from an unusual perspective relative the the totality of the universe ? Do we really 'filter out' extra dimensions as a result of them being curled up in imaginary Cartesian points, or could the apparent dimensionality of M theory be more like an interlaced series of interwoven 'bands of nature' ?
4) Could it be that we have space, time and frequency dimensions ? With brane-like divisions between the three of them ? Thus we could potentially have the electroweak dimension, the gravostrong dimension, and possibly others.
I'd appreciate any constructive criticism for the last two 'questions', as well as answers to the others :)
Regards
Simon
I'd appreciate some help with some questions I have;
1) Is there any reason to be sure/confident that the strong nuclear force is not directly linked with gravity in the same way the other two forces are ?
2) Why are quarks (+gluon field etc) considered to carry the mass - rather than gravitation being seen as a fundamental property of the strong nuclear force, in much the same way that electromagnetic forces are fundamentally connected to to the weak force ?
3) Considering...
-the 'multiplicity of entities' involved in theories of dark matter
-the complete lack of testable evidence for the multiverse
-the suggestive evidence of extra dimensions (quasi-crystals, the 'leak' of gravity, M-Theory maths etc)
...is there any reason not to believe that we view things from an unusual perspective relative the the totality of the universe ? Do we really 'filter out' extra dimensions as a result of them being curled up in imaginary Cartesian points, or could the apparent dimensionality of M theory be more like an interlaced series of interwoven 'bands of nature' ?
4) Could it be that we have space, time and frequency dimensions ? With brane-like divisions between the three of them ? Thus we could potentially have the electroweak dimension, the gravostrong dimension, and possibly others.
I'd appreciate any constructive criticism for the last two 'questions', as well as answers to the others :)
Regards
Simon