MHB -gre.ge.11 x,y of fourth corner of diagonal

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the fourth vertex of a rectangle given three vertices in a coordinate plane. The calculations suggest that the fourth vertex can be determined using the differences in x and y coordinates, leading to the conclusion that the fourth corner is at (3,-7). Observations confirm that the lines connecting the given points do not form perpendicular angles, indicating a diagonal relationship. Participants express confidence in the visual assessment of the shape as a rectangle. The conclusion is that (3,-7) is the correct answer for the fourth vertex.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
In the standard (x,y) coordinate plane below, 3 of the vertices of a rectangle are shown. Which of the following is the 4th vertex of the rectangle?

boyce_20201004144618.png

sorry about the huge image but couldn't find where to scale it down
a. (3,-7)
b. (4,-8)
c. (5,-1)
d. (8,-3)
e. (9,-3)

ok I don't think we need a bunch of equations to do this
$\delta$ x of the with is 3
$\delta$ y of the width is 2

so the fourth corner is
(6-3,-5-2)=(3,-7)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I get that from (2, 1) to (6, -5) is a "delta" of (6- 2, -5- 1)= (4, -6). So the line parallel to that through (-1, -1) goes through (-1+ 4, -1- 6)= (3, -7) also.
 
Just to cover all bases I'd first show that the lines (-1, -1) to (6, -5) and (2, 1) to (-1, -1) are not perpendicular so the line from (-1, -1) to (6, -5) must be a diagonal.

-Dan
 
good point
by observation it sure looks like a rectangle
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top