MHB -gre.ge.2 distance by similiar triangles

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using similar triangles to find the length x in a geometry problem involving a summer camp counselor. Given the lengths AB, EB, BD, and CD, the relationship between these segments is established through the angles AEB and CDE being equal. The calculations show that x can be determined using the proportion x/EB = CD/BD, leading to the conclusion that x equals 1600 ft. A correction is noted regarding the value of BD, confirming it should be 700 ft instead of 7000 ft. The final consensus is that x is indeed 1600 ft based on the corrected measurements.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
030.png

$\textit{not to scale}$
A summer camp counselor wants to find a length, x,
The lengths represented by AB, EB BD,CD on the sketch were determined to be 1800ft, 1400ft, 7000ft, 800 ft respectfully
Segments $AC$ and $DE$ intersect at $B$, and $\angle AEB$ and $\angle CDE$ have the same measure What is the value of $x$?

looks easy but still tricky

$\dfrac{x}{EB}=\dfrac{CD}{BD}
=\dfrac{x}{1400}=\dfrac{800}{700}$
multiple thru by 1400 then simplify
$x=\dfrac{800(1400)}{700}=(800)(2)=1600$ hopefully

I thot I posted this problem some time ago here but didn't see the solution in my overall document🕶
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
x = 1600 ft only if BD = 700 ft instead of 7000 ft
 
mahalo good catch
yes I think its 700 not 7000
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top