MHB Gregory's question at Yahoo Answers (Inner product space)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Space
AI Thread Summary
To prove that the transformation T defined by T(x) = <x,y>z is linear, one must demonstrate that it satisfies the properties of linearity for all vectors u, v in the vector space V and scalars λ, μ in the field F (either ℝ or ℂ). By applying the definition of the inner product and the linearity of the inner product itself, it can be shown that T(λu + μv) equals λT(u) + μT(v). This confirms that T adheres to the linearity conditions, thus proving that T is indeed a linear transformation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the axioms of inner products to establish linearity in vector spaces. The conclusion affirms the successful proof of T's linearity.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Gregory,

If $V$ is the given vector space over the field $\mathbb{F}\;(\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$), for all $\lambda,\mu\in\mathbb{F}$ scalars, for all $u,v\in V$ vectors and using the axioms of inner product: $$\begin{aligned}T(\lambda u+\mu v)&=<\lambda u+\mu v,y>z\\&=(\lambda<u,y>+\mu<v,y>)z\\&=\lambda<u,y>z+\mu<v,y>z\\&=\lambda T(u)+\mu T(v)\\&\Rightarrow T\mbox{ is linear}\end{aligned}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top