I Hamiltonian of a particle moving on the surface of a sphere

Salmone
Messages
101
Reaction score
13
In a quantum mechanical exercise, I found the following Hamiltonian:

Consider a particle of spin 1 constrained to move on the surface of a sphere of radius R with Hamiltonian ##H=\frac{\omega}{\hbar}L^2##. I knew that the Hamiltonian of a particle bound to move on the surface of a sphere was ##H=\frac{L^2}{2mR^2}## and then to get the same Hamiltonian should be ##\omega=\frac{\hbar}{2mR^2}## which dimensionally fits, but is it right? How can this equality be proved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you write yourself, it's just a definition for a parameter ##\omega##. So what should be right or wrong with it?
 
@vanhees71 So ##\omega## is just a parameter which should be equal to ##\frac{\hbar}{2mR^2}## and with dimensions ##s^{-1}##
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top