Harmonic Oscillator problem

In summary, the book derives the wavefunction and probability distribution for the ground state of a harmonic oscillator, both of which have Gaussian distributions with specific dispersion values. By inserting these dispersion values into the Hamiltonian, we can obtain estimates for the typical kinetic and potential energies of the particle in its ground state. This is because variance is by definition the expectation value of x^2, so by inserting dispersion values, we are essentially inserting expectation values. The book then explains that minimizing the Hamiltonian under the uncertainty principle constraint will produce the correct energy value for the ground state, which is why inserting dispersion values leads to the correct solutions.
  • #1
saim_
135
1
The book derives the wavefunction for the ground state of a harmonic oscillator. It's found to be a Gaussian with dispersion [itex]l = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}[/itex]. The probability distribution for momentum is found to be Gaussian as well with dispersion [itex]\sigma_{p} = \frac{\hbar}{2l}[/itex]. The following is the line of the book that I'm having trouble understanding:

"By inserting [itex]x = l[/itex] and [itex]p = \sigma_{p}[/itex] in the Hamiltonian, we obtain estimates of the typical kinetic and potential energies of the particle when it’s in its ground state."

where the Hamiltonian of course is [itex]\frac{1}{2m}\{ p^{2} + \left( m \omega x \right)^{2} \} [/itex].

Problem is: Why does inserting dispersion or variance produce estimates for typical values? Shouldn't this happen when we insert expectation or mean values?

The book goes on to say that minimizing the Hamiltonian after substituting the expressions for the dispersion values, as described above, under the constraint that their product will remain less than or equal to [itex]\frac{\hbar}{2}[/itex] (uncertainty principle), will produce the appropriate value of energy for ground-state. Why does this happen? Why is inserting dispersion values producing these correct solutions? But I think this confusion emerges from same question as before.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
variance IS by definition the expectation value of x^2
so by inserting variance you are indeed getting what you should get
 
  • #3
saim_ said:
The book derives the wavefunction for the ground state of a harmonic oscillator. It's found to be a Gaussian with dispersion [itex]l = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}[/itex]. The probability distribution for momentum is found to be Gaussian as well with dispersion [itex]\sigma_{p} = \frac{\hbar}{2l}[/itex]. The following is the line of the book that I'm having trouble understanding:

"By inserting [itex]x = l[/itex] and [itex]p = \sigma_{p}[/itex] in the Hamiltonian, we obtain estimates of the typical kinetic and potential energies of the particle when it’s in its ground state."

where the Hamiltonian of course is [itex]\frac{1}{2m}\{ p^{2} + \left( m \omega x \right)^{2} \} [/itex].

Problem is: Why does inserting dispersion or variance produce estimates for typical values? Shouldn't this happen when we insert expectation or mean values?

The book goes on to say that minimizing the Hamiltonian after substituting the expressions for the dispersion values, as described above, under the constraint that their product will remain less than or equal to [itex]\frac{\hbar}{2}[/itex] (uncertainty principle), will produce the appropriate value of energy for ground-state. Why does this happen? Why is inserting dispersion values producing these correct solutions? But I think this confusion emerges from same question as before.

Because the H of SHO, as you point out consists of [itex]p^2[/itex] and [itex]x^2[/itex], so [itex]\langle H \rangle[/itex] consists of [itex]\langle p^2[/itex] and [itex]\langle x^2[/itex]. Given that it is clear that [itex]\langle p \rangle 0[/itex] and [itex]\langle x \rangle = 0[/itex], the expectation of H can be computed from the variant.
 
  • #4
Oh, yes, right... thanks alot!
 

FAQ: Harmonic Oscillator problem

What is a harmonic oscillator problem?

A harmonic oscillator problem is a physical or mathematical model that describes the motion of an object that experiences a restoring force proportional to its displacement from equilibrium. It can be represented as a simple pendulum, a mass attached to a spring, or an electronic circuit.

What is the equation for a harmonic oscillator?

The equation for a harmonic oscillator is F = -kx, where F is the restoring force, k is the spring constant, and x is the displacement from equilibrium. This equation is known as Hooke's Law.

What are the factors that affect the motion of a harmonic oscillator?

The factors that affect the motion of a harmonic oscillator include the mass of the object, the spring constant, the initial displacement from equilibrium, and the initial velocity. These factors determine the amplitude, frequency, and period of the oscillations.

What is the difference between a simple harmonic oscillator and a damped harmonic oscillator?

A simple harmonic oscillator is an idealized model that has no external forces acting on it, resulting in undamped oscillations with a constant amplitude and frequency. A damped harmonic oscillator, on the other hand, has an external force (such as friction) that causes the amplitude of the oscillations to decrease over time until the system comes to rest.

How is the harmonic oscillator problem used in real-world applications?

The harmonic oscillator problem has many practical applications, such as in mechanical systems (e.g. shock absorbers), electrical circuits (e.g. LC circuits), and even in quantum mechanics. It is also used as a mathematical model for studying the behavior of waves and vibrations in various fields, including engineering, physics, and biology.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top