MHB Harrison's question via Facebook about polar functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prove It
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Polar
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the angle $\alpha$ satisfies the equation $\frac{2\pi^2}{3} = \alpha^2[1 + \cos(\frac{\alpha}{2})]$ based on two polar functions. The points $(\rho, \alpha)$ and $(\rho, \beta)$ are defined on the curves $r = \frac{3\theta}{2}$ and $r = \theta + \pi$, respectively, with equal distances from the origin. The relationship between $\alpha$ and $\beta$ is established as $\beta = \frac{3\alpha}{2} - \pi$. Using the distance formula for polar coordinates, the equation simplifies to show the required condition for $\alpha$. The proof concludes with the derived equation confirming the relationship.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
The point $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( \rho , \alpha \right) \end{align*}$ lies on the curve $\displaystyle \begin{align*} r = \frac{3\,\theta}{2} \end{align*}$ and the point $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( \rho , \beta \right) \end{align*}$ lies on the curve $\displaystyle \begin{align*} r = \theta + \pi \end{align*}$, such that the points are the same distance from the origin, $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 0\leq \theta \leq \pi \end{align*}$ and the distance between them is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sqrt{3}\,\pi \end{align*}$. Show that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \alpha \end{align*}$ satisfies $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{2\,\pi^2}{3} = \alpha ^2 \,\left[ 1 + \cos{ \left( \frac{\alpha}{2} \right) } \right] \end{align*}$

Since the distances from the origin $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \rho \end{align*}$ are the same, we can say $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \rho = \frac{3\,\alpha}{2} \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \rho = \beta + \pi \end{align*}$, giving

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{3\,\alpha}{2} &= \beta + \pi \\ \beta &= \frac{3\,\alpha}{2} - \pi \end{align*}$

The distance between two points in polar form $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( r_1 , \theta_1 \right) \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( r_2, \theta_2 \right) \end{align*}$ is given by $\displaystyle \begin{align*} d = \sqrt{r_1^2 + r_2^2 - 2\,r_1\,r_2\,\cos{ \left( \theta_1 - \theta_2 \right) }} \end{align*}$, so in this case

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sqrt{3}\,\pi &= \sqrt{ \rho^2 + \rho^2 - 2\,\rho^2 \,\cos{ \left( \alpha - \beta \right) } } \\ \sqrt{3}\,\pi &= \sqrt{ 2\,\rho^2 \,\left[ 1 - \cos{ \left( \alpha - \beta \right) } \right] } \\ 3\,\pi^2 &= 2\,\rho ^2 \,\left[ 1 - \cos{ \left( \alpha - \beta \right) } \right] \\ 3\,\pi^2 &= 2\,\left( \frac{3\,\alpha}{2} \right) ^2 \,\left\{ 1 - \cos{ \left[ \alpha - \left( \frac{3\,\alpha}{2} - \pi \right) \right] } \right\} \\ 3\,\pi^2 &= \frac{9\,\alpha^2}{2} \,\left[ 1 - \cos{\left( \pi - \frac{\alpha}{2} \right) } \right] \\ \frac{2\,\pi^2}{3} &= \alpha^2 \,\left[ 1 - \cos{\left( \pi - \frac{\alpha}{2} \right) } \right] \\ \frac{2\,\pi^2}{3} &= \alpha^2\,\left[ 1 + \cos{ \left( \frac{\alpha}{2} \right) } \right] \end{align*}$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Back
Top