Has a Deep Field Picture of the Sky Been Captured with a Radio Telescope?

  • Stargazing
  • Thread starter zuz
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Picture Sky
  • #1
zuz
87
33
Has anyone ever taken a "deep field" picture of the sky, like Hubble, but with a radio telescope?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Some of the early radio astronomical survey mapping was done by telescopes like "Big Ear" in the North, or by the Mills Cross in the South.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_State_University_Radio_Observatory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mills_Cross_Telescope

To get deeper detailed images of smaller areas, requires VLBI, with international collaboration. The construction of detailed radio images, from the VLBI time data, requires intensive numerical processing. An optical image can be accumulated, on an image sensor array, which is a faster parallel process.
 
  • Informative
Likes berkeman
  • #3
Baluncore said:
To get deeper detailed images of smaller areas, requires VLBI, with international collaboration. The construction of detailed radio images, from the VLBI time data, requires intensive numerical processing. An optical image can be accumulated, on an image sensor array, which is a faster parallel process.
All that exists at FAST but all publications I could find from them were pulsars and FRB and again pulsars, i.e. only the sources that were very bright for the telescope. I wonder whether this is for a reason or due to the relatively young age of FAST.
 
  • #4
fresh_42 said:
All that exists at FAST but all publications I could find from them were pulsars and FRB and again pulsars, i.e. only the sources that were very bright for the telescope.
Deep sky observations require high sensitivity and high resolution. Unfortunately, man-made interference, and nearby bright sources, raise the noise floor of the synthesised images.

The Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST), operating alone, is a single location observatory. Resolution is limited by the 500 metre diameter. FAST finds more pulsars because it has a larger aperture area, and therefore has higher sensitivity than earlier observatories. It can make point measurements, where the signal is the sum of all the beam energy. That is suited to strong signals, or pulsar observations, not deep sky.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-hundred-meter_Aperture_Spherical_Telescope

The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) has a distributed aperture, so should have over 1000 times the resolution of FAR, since SKA is designed to operate as a long baseline interferometer. That would be more suited to deep sky observations, if you can find and fund the computer time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_Kilometre_Array

FAST is located at about 26° North, and zenith limited, so is restricted to the northern sky. It is not as steerable as the elements of the SKA.
The SKA is based in Africa and Australia, with many more steerable elements. It is better positioned to observe the southern sky with the best view of the Milky Way.
 
  • Informative
Likes fresh_42
  • #6
Thank you. That is just what I was looking for.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and berkeman

FAQ: Has a Deep Field Picture of the Sky Been Captured with a Radio Telescope?

1. What is a deep field picture?

A deep field picture is an image of a small region of the sky that is taken with the purpose of capturing very faint and distant objects. This type of observation requires long exposure times to collect enough light from these distant sources, revealing galaxies, stars, and other celestial objects that are not visible in shorter exposures.

2. Has a deep field picture of the sky been captured with a radio telescope?

Yes, deep field pictures of the sky have been captured using radio telescopes. One notable example is the Very Large Array (VLA) Sky Survey, which includes deep field observations. These radio deep fields help astronomers study the universe in radio wavelengths, revealing information about galaxies, black holes, and other cosmic phenomena that are not detectable in visible light.

3. How do radio deep field images differ from optical deep field images?

Radio deep field images differ from optical deep field images in the type of electromagnetic radiation they capture. Optical deep fields, like the famous Hubble Deep Field, capture visible light, while radio deep fields capture radio waves. This allows radio deep fields to reveal different types of astronomical objects and phenomena, such as radio galaxies, quasars, and cosmic microwave background radiation, which are not visible in optical wavelengths.

4. What are some notable radio deep field surveys?

Some notable radio deep field surveys include the VLA Sky Survey (VLASS), the Australia Telescope Large Area Survey (ATLAS), and the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey (LoTSS). These surveys have provided valuable data on the radio universe, contributing to our understanding of galaxy formation, evolution, and the large-scale structure of the cosmos.

5. What scientific discoveries have been made using radio deep field images?

Radio deep field images have led to several important scientific discoveries. They have helped identify and study distant radio galaxies and quasars, provided insights into the cosmic evolution of star-forming galaxies, and contributed to our understanding of the cosmic microwave background radiation. These observations have also shed light on the distribution and behavior of dark matter and dark energy in the universe.

Similar threads

Stargazing What did I capture?
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top