- #1
- 3,636
- 1,010
by any chance?
Last edited:
It might be under the dresser. Those rascals are quite easy to lose track of.e.bar.goum said:Damn, you lost it again?!
Checked behind the couch?
Borek said:If not Higgs' Boson, then perhaps Hugged Bison will do?
Astronuc said:Perhaps they will be more successful at measuring it's elusivity.
Anyway - just in case - what colour is it? If I see one, I'll let folks know.
e.bar.goum said:Damn, you lost it again?!
Checked behind the couch?
Several women have. That's why he's no longer running for president.epenguin said:by any chance?
PAllen said:Hey, I always thought the Higgs was colorless if SM is correct ...
Ivan Seeking said:While colorless and odorless, most people think they taste like chicken.
Ivan Seeking said:While colorless and odorless, most people think they taste like chicken.
Jimmy Snyder said:I think we're all bosons this bus.
turbo said:Peter Higgs theorized about the existence of a mass-granting boson quite a while back. Many millions of dollars have been spent trying to find this wonderful particle. While current experiments have managed to rule out larger and larger spreads of energies where the Higgs can't be, there is a curious lack of professional curiosity IMO.
What if Higgs was off base, and the Standard Model of particle physics needs to be modified so that particles can be shown to have mass without the mediation of intermediate particles?
A yoctosecond is 10 to the minus 24th of a second, which is is one septillionth (short scale) of a second. I thought CMS and ATLAS had sampling rates and frequencies that are much much longer than this, so how to capture such a rare and exceedingly fast event ? Since this is GD I only expect a layman's response to steer me in the right direction, unless of course some BSM professional is out there who cares to answer to a higher level of fidelity, so to speak.The Higgs is the holdout. One major problem with finding the Higgs is it doesn’t stick around very long. It’s too ephemeral to be captured in a bottle. It theoretically winks into existence in high-energy collisions for a mere yoctosecond, which is one-septillionth of a second.
It then decays into less-exotic particles that careen in all directions in an uncontrolled spew. The challenge for scientists is to analyze this decay pattern and look for authentic Higgs debris buried amid the subatomic wreckage.
It’s like stalking a snow leopard by its footprints after a million other big cats have tramped across the same snow field.
After the announcement, physicists immediately did what physicists do: They argued about the data.
and...
In the past year, the LHC has produced some 300 trillion collisions. And still it’s not enough. The search requires powerful computers looking for a Higgs-suggestive bump, or an “excess of events,” in some region of the data.
Such a bump has now appeared at a specific place, showing something with a mass of around 125 billion electron volts, roughly 125 times the mass of a proton. If that’s the Higgs, it would support the Standard Model of particle physics and be in a range where further scrutiny might turn up more definitive proof.