- #1
mcah5
- 38
- 0
The problem follows:
Suppose you have a massless dashpot having two moving parts 1 and 2 that can move relative to one another along the x direction, which is transverse to the string direction z. Friction is provided by a fluid that retards the relative motion of the two moving parts. The friction is such that the force needed to maintain relative velocity [tex] x_1 - x_2 [/tex] between the two moving parts is [tex] Z_d*(x_1 - x_2) [/tex], where [tex] Z_d [/tex] is the impedance of the dashpot. The input (part 1) is connected to the end of a string of impedance Z_1 stretching from -infinity to 0. The output (part 2) is connected to a string of impedance [tex] Z_2 [/tex] that extends to z = infinity. Show that a wave incident from the left experiences an impedance at z = 0 which is as if the impedances [tex] Z_d [/tex] and [tex] Z_2 [/tex] where connected in parallel.
I'm thinking:
The wave incident from -infinity will hit the dashpot and experience a force in the opposite direction of [tex] x_1 * Z_L [/tex], where Z_L is the "load" impedance we are trying to show is equal to Z_d*Z_2 / (Z_d + Z_2). This means that a force [tex] x_1 * Z_L [/tex] is exerted on "part 1" of the dashpot. The second part of the dashpot experiences a force [tex] Z_2 * {x_2} [/tex] on it. Therefore, the dashpot has a "tension" of [tex] x_1 * Z_L + Z_2 * x_2 [/tex] and the two parts of the dashpot will be moving with relative velocity [tex] x_1 - x_2 [/tex]. So I have the equation [tex] x_1 * Z_L + Z_2 * x_2 [/tex] = [tex] Z_d (x_1 - x_2) [/tex]
Problem is that this doesn't get me to my desired answer of Z_L = Z_d*Z_2/(Z_d+Z_2). I was wondering what other information I need to solve the problem.
edit: I can't seem to get \\dot{x} to work. Please pretend all the x's have dots over them
Suppose you have a massless dashpot having two moving parts 1 and 2 that can move relative to one another along the x direction, which is transverse to the string direction z. Friction is provided by a fluid that retards the relative motion of the two moving parts. The friction is such that the force needed to maintain relative velocity [tex] x_1 - x_2 [/tex] between the two moving parts is [tex] Z_d*(x_1 - x_2) [/tex], where [tex] Z_d [/tex] is the impedance of the dashpot. The input (part 1) is connected to the end of a string of impedance Z_1 stretching from -infinity to 0. The output (part 2) is connected to a string of impedance [tex] Z_2 [/tex] that extends to z = infinity. Show that a wave incident from the left experiences an impedance at z = 0 which is as if the impedances [tex] Z_d [/tex] and [tex] Z_2 [/tex] where connected in parallel.
I'm thinking:
The wave incident from -infinity will hit the dashpot and experience a force in the opposite direction of [tex] x_1 * Z_L [/tex], where Z_L is the "load" impedance we are trying to show is equal to Z_d*Z_2 / (Z_d + Z_2). This means that a force [tex] x_1 * Z_L [/tex] is exerted on "part 1" of the dashpot. The second part of the dashpot experiences a force [tex] Z_2 * {x_2} [/tex] on it. Therefore, the dashpot has a "tension" of [tex] x_1 * Z_L + Z_2 * x_2 [/tex] and the two parts of the dashpot will be moving with relative velocity [tex] x_1 - x_2 [/tex]. So I have the equation [tex] x_1 * Z_L + Z_2 * x_2 [/tex] = [tex] Z_d (x_1 - x_2) [/tex]
Problem is that this doesn't get me to my desired answer of Z_L = Z_d*Z_2/(Z_d+Z_2). I was wondering what other information I need to solve the problem.
edit: I can't seem to get \\dot{x} to work. Please pretend all the x's have dots over them
Last edited: