- #1
- 24,775
- 792
noted in surrogate sticky
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=682928#post682928
I printed this paper out and tried unsuccessfully for an hour or so to understand his argument. maybe someone else can elucidate. I am stumped.
The paper is short, 5 pages, with few formulas. It goes over the
argument he gave at the Dublin conference last year, about BH
information loss (not). I was hoping when his paper on this came out
that I would understand his reasoning better, but it didnt happen.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=682928#post682928
I printed this paper out and tried unsuccessfully for an hour or so to understand his argument. maybe someone else can elucidate. I am stumped.
The paper is short, 5 pages, with few formulas. It goes over the
argument he gave at the Dublin conference last year, about BH
information loss (not). I was hoping when his paper on this came out
that I would understand his reasoning better, but it didnt happen.
Last edited: