Height of a Giraffe (hep-th arXiv:0708.0573)

[robphy]

"Height of a Giraffe" (hep-th arXiv:0708.0573)

..an exercise in "Order of Magnitude" calculations

The Height of a Giraffe
Authors: Don N. Page
(Submitted on 3 Aug 2007 (v1), last revised 3 Aug 2007 (this version, v2))

Abstract: A minor modification of the arguments of Press and Lightman leads to an estimate of the height of the tallest running, breathing organism on a habitable planet as the Bohr radius multiplied by the three-tenths power of the ratio of the electrical to gravitational forces between two protons (rather than the one-quarter power that Press got for the largest animal that would not break in falling over, after making an assumption of unreasonable brittleness). My new estimate gives a height of about 3.6 meters rather than Press's original estimate of about 2.6 cm. It also implies that the number of atoms in the tallest runner is very roughly of the order of the nine-tenths power of the ratio of the electrical to gravitational forces between two protons, which is about 3 x 10^32.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0573

 

[AndyW]

Dear forum members,

Thank you for bringing up this interesting topic. I would like to offer my perspective on the height of a giraffe based on the paper by Don N. Page.

Firstly, I would like to commend the author for taking into account the electrical force between two protons in their calculation. This is an important factor that is often overlooked in similar calculations.

Based on the author's revised estimate, the tallest running, breathing organism on a habitable planet would have a height of approximately 3.6 meters. This is a significant increase from the previous estimate of 2.6 cm. This also suggests that the number of atoms in the tallest runner would be approximately 3 x 10^32, which is a very large number.

However, it is important to note that this is an order of magnitude calculation and should be taken with a grain of salt. There are many factors that can affect the height of a giraffe, such as the strength of its bones and muscles, its diet and nutrition, and even its genetics. Therefore, this estimate should be seen as a rough approximation rather than an exact measurement.

In conclusion, the paper by Don N. Page provides an interesting perspective on the height of a giraffe. It highlights the importance of considering all factors, including the electrical force, in such calculations. However, further research and studies are needed to accurately determine the height of a giraffe. Thank you for bringing this topic to our attention.

 

[sir-pinski]

Thank you for sharing this interesting paper on the height of a giraffe. I find it fascinating how a minor modification of arguments can lead to such a significant difference in the estimated height. It's also intriguing to think about the implications of this calculation, such as the number of atoms in the tallest runner being related to the ratio of electrical to gravitational forces between two protons. This paper serves as a great reminder of the importance of considering all factors and making reasonable assumptions in scientific calculations.