MHB Height of Rocket Over Sloping Ground - PRECAL INVERSE FUNCTION PROBLEM

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a precalculus problem involving the height of a rocket launched from a sloping cliff. The height function of the rocket is given as h(x) = -2x^2 + 120x, and the slope of the ground is modeled by g(x) = -4x. The height of the rocket above the sloping ground is derived as f(x) = -2x^2 + 124x, with a maximum height of 1922 feet occurring at an x-coordinate of 31 feet. The final part of the discussion involves finding the inverse function relating the x-coordinate to the height, leading to the equation x = 31 - (1/2)√(3844 - 2h). The calculations confirm the maximum height and provide a clear function for further analysis.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

PRECAL INVERSE FUNCTION PROBLEM PLEASE HELP?


Clovis is standing at the edge of a cliff, which slopes 4 feet downward from him for every 1 horizontal foot. He launches a small model rocket from where he is standing.

With the origin of the coordinate system located where he is standing, and the x-axis extending horizontally, the path of the rocket is described by the formula y= -2x^2 + 120x.

a.) Give a function h = f(x) relating the height h of the rocket above the sloping ground to its x-coordinate.

0 = -2x^2 +124

b.) Find the maximum height of the rocket above the sloping ground. What is its x-coordinate when it is at its maximum height?

MAX: 31, 1922

c.) Clovis measures its height h of the rocket above the sloping ground while it is going up. Give a function x = g(h) relating the x-coordinate of the rocket to h.

The maximum I get for the rocket is (31, 1922)
I am pretty sure it is right because the answer in the back of the book is 31 - 1/2 sqrt3844 - 2h
so the 31 is probably correct!
I just need the answer to C (obviously), I'd really appreciate it if you could guide me through it rather than just answers.
Please no use of Calculus terms, I am in Precalc.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Robin,

We are given the trajectory of the rocket as:

$$h(x)=-2x^2+120x$$

And we may model the surface of the ground by observing it passes through the origin of our coordinate system and has a slope of $-4$. Thus the "ground" function is:

$$g(x)=-4x$$

a.) Give a function h = f(x) relating the height h of the rocket above the sloping ground to its x-coordinate.

The height of the rocket above the ground at $x$ is the difference between the two functions:

$$f(x)=h(x)-g(x)=\left(-2x^2+120x \right)-(-4x)=-2x^2+124x=2x(62-x)$$

I think you meant to give this but simply made a typo and left off the variable of the linear term.

b.) Find the maximum height of the rocket above the sloping ground. What is its x-coordinate when it is at its maximum height?

From part a) we see the two roots of $f(x)$ are:

$$x=0,\,62$$

Now, we know the axis of symmetry, along which the vertex lies, will be midway between the roots. Using the mid-point formula, we then find the axis of symmetry is:

$$x=\frac{0+62}{2}=31$$

The height at the value of $x$ is:

$$f(31)=2\cdot31(62-31)=2\cdot31^2=1922$$

Hence:

$$f_{\max}=f(31)=1922$$

We have found that the rocket reaches a maximum height of 1922 ft at a horizontal distance of 31 ft from the origin.

This agrees with what you found. (Clapping)

c.) Clovis measures its height h of the rocket above the sloping ground while it is going up. Give a function x = g(h) relating the x-coordinate of the rocket to h.

Recall we found:

$$f(x)=-2x^2+124x$$

Arrange in standard quadratic form:

$$2x^2-124x+f=0$$

Application of the quadratic formula yields:

$$x=\frac{124\pm\sqrt{(-124)^2-4(2)(f)}}{2(2)}=\frac{62\pm\sqrt{3844-2f}}{2}$$

Now, since $f$ is not a one-to-one function, we must observe that the relevant domain of $f$ is $$0\le x\le62$$ and so we must take the branch:

$$x=\frac{62-\sqrt{3844-2f}}{2}=31-\frac{\sqrt{3844-2f}}{2}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top