Helicopters and Angular Momentum

AI Thread Summary
Helicopters counteract the torque generated by their main rotor blades primarily through the use of a tail rotor, which also helps control the helicopter's orientation. The tail rotor produces a counteracting force to balance the torque and maintain stability, requiring the helicopter to lean slightly towards the thrust side during hover. The gyroscopic effect of the main rotor creates a pitch reaction to roll torque, necessitating advanced control inputs from the pilot. A notable reference for understanding these dynamics is the book 'Chickenhawk' by an ex-Vietnam helicopter pilot, which vividly describes the flying experience. Overall, the interaction between rotor dynamics and pilot control is crucial for effective helicopter operation.
azabak
32
0
How does an helicopter counteract the torque generated by its blades?
And the tail blades, what are they for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The main function of the tail blade (rotor?) is to counteract the torque applied to the main rotor. You can also use the tail rotor to control where the helicopter is pointing. If you lose drive to the tail rotor (/fan / nozzle) you are in real trouble.
 
azabak said:
How does an helicopter counteract the torque generated by its blades? And the tail blades, what are they for?
The tail rotor is used to counter act the torque along the main rotor axis (yaw). This results in a net force to one side, so a true hover requires a helicopter to lean a bit towards the thrust side of the tail rotor.

The gyroscopic effect of the main rotor results in a pitch reaction to roll torque and vice versa. The pilot pitch and roll controls end up being advanced by 90° along the rotor axis to compensate for this.
 
Last edited:
For the best description, ever, of all this, read the first couple of chapters in 'Chickenhawk' by an ex Vietnam Chopper pilot. He describes learning to fly a Bell Huey and leaves you, the reader, sweating and with palpitations as if you're actually in the pilot's seat. No fly-by-wire in those days.
 
Oh, I see. Thanks you guys!
 
sophiecentaur said:
For the best description, ever, of all this, read the first couple of chapters in 'Chickenhawk' by an ex Vietnam Chopper pilot. He describes learning to fly a Bell Huey and leaves you, the reader, sweating and with palpitations as if you're actually in the pilot's seat. No fly-by-wire in those days.

Although it's the last paragraph of the book that really sticks with you...
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top