MHB HelloWorld's questions at Yahoo Questions invovling solids of revolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revolution Solids
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a region bounded by the curves x = y^2 and y = x^2 using the shell method and washer method for both x-axis and y-axis rotations. For the x-axis rotation, the volume is derived as V = (3π)/10 using both methods, confirming consistency between the two approaches. The calculations involve determining the limits of integration and applying the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. When rotating about the y-axis, a similar process is followed, leading to the same volume result. The symmetry of the problem suggests that the volumes will be equivalent regardless of the axis of rotation.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Volume by shells method?

Find the volume by shells of the region bounded by:

x = y^2
y = x^2

a) Rotated about the x-axis

b) Rotated about the y-axis

How would you go about solving?

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello HelloWorld,

First, we should observe that since there is cyclic symmetry between the variables, we should expect to get the same result revolving about either axis, however, I will work through both parts of the problem as if we do not know this. Also, I will use both the shell and washer methods, to demonstrate both methods, and as a check.

First, let's draw a diagram of the region to be revolved:

View attachment 1334

a) Revolving about the $x$-axis, using the shell method, we find the volume of an arbitrary shell is:

$$dV=2\pi rh\,dy$$

where:

$$r=y$$

$$h=\sqrt{y}-y^2=y^{\frac{1}{2}}-y^2$$

And so we have:

$$dV=2\pi y\left(y^{\frac{1}{2}}-y^2 \right)\,dy=2\pi \left(y^{\frac{3}{2}}-y^3 \right)\,dy$$

Summing the shells by integrating, we first determine the limits of integration. If we square the equation $x=y^2$ to get $x^2=y^4$, then equate the two expressions for $x^2$, we find:

$$y=y^4$$

$$y\left(1-y^3 \right)=0$$

$$y(1-y)\left(1+y+y^2 \right)=0$$

The two real roots are:

$$y=0,\,1$$

Which means the two curves intersect at the points $(0,0),\,(1,1)$.

Hence, we may find the volume with:

$$V=2\pi\int_0^1 y^{\frac{3}{2}}-y^3\,dy$$

Applying the FTOC, we have:

$$V=2\pi\left[\frac{2}{5}y^{\frac{5}{2}}-\frac{1}{4}y^4 \right]_0^1=2\pi\left(\frac{2}{5}-\frac{1}{4} \right)=\frac{3\pi}{10}$$

Now, let's check this by using the washer method. The volume of an arbitrary washer is:

$$dV=\pi\left(R^2-r^2 \right)\,dx$$

where:

$$R=\sqrt{x}$$

$$r=x^2$$

and so we have:

$$dV=\pi\left(\left(\sqrt{x} \right)^2-\left(x^2 \right)^2 \right)\,dx=\pi\left(x-x^4 \right)\,dx$$

Summing the washers, we find:

$$V=pi\int_0^1 x-x^4\,dx$$

Applying the FTOC, we find:

$$V=\pi\left[\frac{1}{2}x^2-\frac{1}{5}x^5 \right]_0^1=\pi\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{5} \right)=\frac{3\pi}{10}$$

And this checks with the result from the shell method.

b) Revolving about the $y$-axis, using the shell method, we find the volume of an arbitrary shell is:

$$dV=2\pi rh\,dx$$

where:

$$r=x$$

$$h=\sqrt{x}-x^2=x^{\frac{1}{2}}-x^2$$

And so we have:

$$dV=2\pi x\left(x^{\frac{1}{2}}-x^2 \right)\,dy=2\pi \left(x^{\frac{3}{2}}-x^3 \right)\,dx$$

Since we will integrate from $x=0$ to $x=1$ it now becomes obvious that we will get the same volume as in part a).
 

Attachments

  • helloworld.jpg
    helloworld.jpg
    6.9 KB · Views: 83
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top